Bill Barker wrote: Before I start performing major surgery on the TC4/5 connector, I wanted to check on what is the reason for having the attributes field in CoyoteRequest (instead of just delegating to the o.a.c.Request like the 3.3 Adapter does). At the moment, the SSL request attributes
remm2002/10/19 02:30:37 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net PoolTcpEndpoint.java Log: - Attempts to address bug 13736. - Add code for recovery if the serverSocket dies. Needs testing (I tested with an exception thrown according to a random value after the socket
Hi folks, currently I'm busy on tomcat and mod_jk2 (2.0.1) for my new employer. The Apache Server Status and Information page thinks that mod_jk2/2.0.0 is loaded. But I'm sure that mod_jk2-1.3-eapi.so is version 2.0.1. That's it ... greetings from Germany Volker -- We haven't figured out
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13781. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I really like the new administration web app for Tomcat. I think it will go a long way to further the use of Tomcat by users that want to focus on building their application and not have to learn the configuration XML structures of Tomcat. I also think this type of an Administration Console
Bill, Remy, I have seen this one once on our production system running Tomcat 3.3.1 with AJP1.3, Apache 1.3.27, mod_jk 1.1.0 This is on Sparc Solaris 8 running JDK 1.3.1_04. 11019 is our ajp13 port (which we uswe also as shutdown port. No AJP 1.2 port open) Our webservers use the lb_worker to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13784. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.