remm2003/07/31 23:14:40
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
- Remove (for now) dead reload code.
Revision ChangesPath
1.78 +1 -148
remm2003/07/31 23:54:10
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
- Update to Xerces 2.5.0 (will revert to 2.4.0 if there are problems ;-) ).
Revision ChangesPath
1.99 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22041.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hi there,
may be, this isn't really important but why is there no DTD or scheme to
validate the server.xml ? in combination with the defined DTD for validating
the mbeans descriptor file this should be a 'nice' feature. so if You are
interested in developing / using such a scheme I would start to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2003/06/15 11:31:45
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
HTMLManagerServlet.java LocalStrings.properties
ManagerServlet.java
Log:
- Update the manager to implement the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mertz, Wendy (Director Corporate Systems, IT) a écrit :
To whom it may concern:
We are trying to install and link Apache with Tomcat and am unable to locate the build-hpux.sh script for Apache 1.3.14 to Tomcat 3.2.3 (HP Unix 11.0). Can you assist me by providing me the script?
Thank you in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web server
[ ] +0 ok to release
[ ] -0 release, but I
I'm not interested, here's why:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/misc.html#dtd
-Tim
Sabine Winkler wrote:
hi there,
may be, this isn't really important but why is there no DTD or scheme to
validate the server.xml ? in combination with the defined DTD for validating
the mbeans descriptor
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web server
[ ] +0 ok to release
[
Henri Gomez a écrit :
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web
Howdy,
Thanks and enjoy the trip Remy ;)
Yoav Shapira (Also another -LE build user)
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [4.1.27] Builds uploaded
Hi,
I
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
I've found one problem on the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I can confirm what Henri said, laddr had always been a ulong and
was only type in_addr_t for a short period of time.
Does mod_jk 1.2.4 build and work correctly? It used a ulong for laddr.
What web server are you building this for?
If you are building for Apache 2 it may be a problem with the
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for laddr is the cause of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22032.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sabine Winkler wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:15:46 +0200
From: Sabine Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Validation of the server.xml
hi there,
may be, this isn't
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21279.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2003/08/01 10:10:11
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Collector.java
PageInfo.java
Log:
Removed unused methods and instance vars
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +2 -9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/1/2003 4:39:27 AM
No problems have been reported since the last test source
distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for NetWare Apache
Henri Gomez said:
The correct behaviour will be to use in_addr_t, but it don't works on
iSeries (even if it's defined, I couldn't find the correct include).
To fix the problem we could use a #define BSD64 ? to make use of
in_addr_t until we make more works ?
Just provide the correct
Something from the user list of note for development.
The current method does something like this when handling a
communication exception at authenticate time:
/ If not a Socket closed. error then rethrow.
if (e.getMessage().indexOf(Socket closed) 0)
I wonder if any tomcat guys have any insight they could share with us...
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 20:02
To: James-Dev Mailing List
Cc: Ted Neward; Jeroen Frijters
Subject: JDK 1.4.2 and class loading
Apparently,
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Validation of the server.xml
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sabine Winkler wrote:
may be, this isn't really important but why is there no DTD or scheme to
validate the server.xml ? in combination with
Dear Jakarta Tomcat Development Team,
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/)
Hello,
I am now in the process of preparing the first all-Apache-wide newsletter.
http://www.apache.org/newsletter/
Please feel free to write statement/comment etc. to
the Apache Newsletter (Issue 1) using ApacheWiki
or
45 matches
Mail list logo
