DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23209] New: - URL not escaped for logging

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23211] New: - ServletContext,getRequestDispatcher throws exception for invalid path instead of returning null

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat within custom application

2003-09-17 Thread Xtremebytes Webmaster
Thanks Remy. I have managed to run the embedded Tomcat 4x. However, I still have a bit of a problem with context configuration. Suppose I install a WAR directory containing a XSLT servlet. The output from this XSLT servlet is XHTML, which contains relative references to images and CSS files. If I p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23211] - ServletContext,getRequestDispatcher throws exception for invalid path instead of returning null

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating

2003-09-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta I didn't get futher reports concerning bug 21763 (and related), so I assume this means things improved. It would be a good idea to release a new 4.1.28 build once this is confirmed to also provide a fix for Tomcat 4.1.x. Since the amount of other outst

[PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Steve Appling
Currently the option for compression="on" in the coyote connector is broken (see bug 18073). The solution presented in the patches attached to that bug seemed overly complicated. Here is an alternate patch that also fixes the problem. This patch changes 3 things: 1) Decreases the minimum compres

Re: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Henri Gomez
Steve Appling a écrit : Currently the option for compression="on" in the coyote connector is broken (see bug 18073). The solution presented in the patches attached to that bug seemed overly complicated. Here is an alternate patch that also fixes the problem. This patch changes 3 things: 1) Decrea

Re: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Steve Appling a écrit : Currently the option for compression="on" in the coyote connector is broken (see bug 18073). The solution presented in the patches attached to that bug seemed overly complicated. Here is an alternate patch that also fixes the problem. This patch ch

RE: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Steve Appling
Henri Gomez wrote: > Are you sure you want to compress content less than 2k ? > > BTW, you could use compression property for your purpose. You are correct, the property works fine. > > 3) Added application/x-javascript as a default compressable > >type. Now it allows all mime types starting wi

Re: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Henri Gomez
Steve Appling a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Are you sure you want to compress content less than 2k ? BTW, you could use compression property for your purpose. You are correct, the property works fine. 3) Added application/x-javascript as a default compressable type. Now it allows all mime ty

Re: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Steve Appling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there really browsers that send "Accept-Encoding: gzip", but > don't really accept it? This is from mod_gzip: . > I was not aware of that. Which ones do this? In short, Net

RE: [PATCH] fix compression="on" option on coyote connector

2003-09-17 Thread Steve Appling
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > In short, Netscape 4 probably won't work at all, MSIE seems to have > trouble unless you have a certain fix installed. All others should > work (even for the JavaScript case). > > The mod_gzip author recommends not compressing anything for Netscape 4 > at all. > There is a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23192] - getRemoteUser() returns null with Authorization header

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23228] New: - JSP Error -- Unknown attribute type (String) for attribute

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23228] - JSP Error -- Unknown attribute type (String) for attribute

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23231] New: - Bad Request, page failed to be served, due to jave length overflow

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java

2003-09-17 Thread luehe
luehe 2003/09/17 16:26:33 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java Log: Fix for Bugtraq 4924326 ("JMX registrations of servlets that map to the same jsp-file use the same name") This allows for the following 2 servlets

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23233] New: - Dynfunctioning of the translation from JSP to Java

2003-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating

2003-09-17 Thread Hans Bergsten
Remy Maucherat wrote: [ ] Alpha [x] Beta It runs all examples in my upcoming JSP 2.0 book, so it looks fine to me. I had some problems with a bundled Xerces version, but for now I consider that an application problem rather than a container problem. If further analysis proves otherwise, I'll let

RE: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating

2003-09-17 Thread Richard Norman
I agree... Beta... I had a little problem with the ISAPI redirector... But that all is working now... All applications and Database access I am doing works as well. I still would like Isapi redirector 2 to work, but that may be something more to do with my configuration as opposed to any issues w