Re: How to configure a tomcat project in Eclipse.

2004-06-01 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hello, used following plugins: Lomboz Plugin download: http://forge.objectweb.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=97 info http://www.objectlearn.com/projects/lomboz.jsp or search to the eclipse plugin pages: http://www.eclipse-plugins.info/eclipse/plugins.jsp?category=Tomcat or programming help

RE: How to configure a tomcat project in Eclipse.

2004-06-01 Thread Jagsir.Dhillon
Hi peter, What I actually meant by Tomcat Project, was't a tomcat webapps project, But Project from tomcat Source code. Please treat it accordingly. Regards, Jagsir -Original Message- From: Peter Rossbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:58 AM To: Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-06-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course) unless I hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today. I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in that area. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research

CVS branching

2004-06-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26 on the main branch. The actual CVS command is easy: cvs

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq misc.xml

2004-06-01 Thread yoavs
yoavs 2004/06/01 06:13:19 Modified:docs/faq misc.html docs/faq/printer misc.html xdocs-faq misc.xml Log: Added logging configuration link. Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/misc.html Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29174] - complain about liveDeploy tags and enhance documentation of deployOnStartup

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29174. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28234] - uri: worker property does not exist any more

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28234. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-06-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course) unless I hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today. I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in that area. I need to tweak a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28612] - configure script fails locating libapr

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28612. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26890] - Multipart/Form-Data Unexpected End Of Part

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26890. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-06-01 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Remy Maucherat wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building?

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-06-01 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on go ahead, refator. :-) I'll refator then. I'll redo logging as well, and define c-l categories (for webapps, for example) to be able to eventually remove Logger altogether.

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-06-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: I think renaming the classes, like they did for Xerces in j2se 1.5, would be the easiest way. But since we are refactoring, we can also think of a pluggable SPI were the digester can be plugged, as well as our own parsing mechanism. That would be usefull when Tomcat

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java InternalInputBuffer.java

2004-06-01 Thread remm
remm2004/06/01 07:34:22 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java InternalInputBuffer.java Log: - Bug 29166: Tweak expectation handling so that if the expectation isn't satisfied, we don't attempt to swallow the request's

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-06-01 Thread remm
remm2004/06/01 08:00:10 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: - Update changelog. Revision ChangesPath 1.60 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml

GateLock Virus Notification.

2004-06-01 Thread GateLockX200
Dear GateLock user, GateLock has detected the WORM_NETSKY.D in your email attachment application.pif. The file could not be cleaned and was therefore deleted.---BeginMessage--- Please read the attached file. ---End Message--- -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29166] - Expect: 100-Continue fails after 401 Unauthorized

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29324] New: - Admin Application can't create new Host with server-minimal.xml

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29324. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29324] - Admin Application can't create new Host with server-minimal.xml

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29324. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28631] - JAASRealm fix to permit user-specified user/group Principals

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] - Servlet invoked twice with JK2 when response is not read completely.

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: CVS branching

2004-06-01 Thread Bill Barker
Since Gump(y) hasn't built for months, it can't complain more than it already is doing ;-). The real question is whether we want to run Gump on the 5.0 branch as well as HEAD. - Original Message - From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] New: - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26783] - File Upload fails for files 8K

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26783. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23610] - unknown SSI directives

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/deployer build.xml

2004-06-01 Thread yoavs
yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:09 Modified:resources/deployer build.xml Log: Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940 Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/deployer/build.xml Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-06-01 Thread yoavs
yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:20 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940 Revision ChangesPath 1.61 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28940] - Deployer can't treat multi-byte characters in JSP correctly

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev
Quick question, is there a reason the user code has access to the internal session instead of the session facade on session events? event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside StandardSession as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade? event = new

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Quick question, is there a reason the user code has access to the internal session instead of the session facade on session events? event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside StandardSession as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade?

RE: CVS branching

2004-06-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'd like to get Gump to build. It seems like it's getting the wrong struts version (1.0.2 instead of 1.1), thereby causing compile errors for the admin webapp? Anyways, let's not continue that discussion in this thread. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Gump build failures

2004-06-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Looking at http://gump.covalent.net/log/jakarta-tomcat-5.html, I see Gump failed to build because of admin webapp compilation errors that appear related to the Struts version used. What is our process for debugging this? Are we responsible to ensure the Gump builds succeed? Who owns the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

2004-06-01 Thread bobh
/jakarta-regexp/build/jakarta-regexp-20040601.jar -Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3 -Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist -Dsite2.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2 -Dcommons-collections.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections

Re: Gump build failures

2004-06-01 Thread Bill Barker
Yup, it seems that the Struts team has changed things about a year ago so that the admin doesn't work with it anymore. For debugging this one, it is probably enough to build Tomcat against a CVS co of struts. In general, you can co gump to a machine with python installed and debug the entire

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27222] - Jk2: error mmapping shm file leads to workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed on Apache 1.3

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27222. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29333] New: - Unable to read TLD

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev
Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Filip - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:02 PM Subject: Re: session

Re: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Try it by turning the Security Manager on ;-) -- Jeanfrancois Filip - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat

Re: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Missed that one ;) As Jean-Fran├žois said, the security manager will avoid the problem. I think it won't hurt replacing the thiss with getSession()s in the

Re: Re: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread info
Het adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] is voorlopig niet meer in gebruik vanwege grote hoeveelheden virusmails die daarop binnenkomen. Gebruik het nieuwe adres dat op de website staat (linksonder). Excuses voor het ongemak! - To

RE: session facade not used for event

2004-06-01 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
ok, I can do this tomorrow. Filip -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:09 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: session facade not used for event Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29333] - Unable to read TLD

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] New: - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

2004-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.