DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30768] - Servlet Filter setCharacterEncoding not work and Enable JAAS mechanism

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Keith Wannamaker wrote: ballot The 4.1.31 maintenance release should happen: [X] Yes [ ] No /ballot Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/jakarta-tomcat-catalina success

2004-08-23 Thread bobh
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success' Full

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success

2004-08-23 Thread bobh
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success' Full details

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0 success

2004-08-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success' Full

Hi

2004-08-23 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Notice.txt .exe (in Notice.zip) The uncleanable file

GateLock Virus Notification.

2004-08-23 Thread GateLockX200
Dear GateLock user, GateLock has detected the WORM_NETSKY.D in your email attachment message_details.pif. The file could not be cleaned and was therefore deleted.---BeginMessage--- Your file is attached. ---End Message--- - To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30803] New: - WebApp classloader fails to load classes from CATALINA_HOME\shared\lib

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30803. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [VOTE] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I think we long ago agreed not to vote -1 just because you want somebody to work on a different codebase :-) It must have been long enough ago that I wasn't here ;) I don't remember it. Anyways, since is a (non-lazy) majority vote so my -1 is not a veto, just an opinion. We already had

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30780] - JSTL tags don't work for jsp (xml) documents

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30780. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 RELEASE-PLAN-5.5.txt

2004-08-23 Thread remm
remm2004/08/23 10:26:09 Added: .RELEASE-PLAN-5.5.txt Log: - Add a draft release plan for HEAD. - It's numbered 5.5, because: * I think the default packaging should be for J2SE 5.0 * The API isn't compatible with 5.0.x, hence a larger number change

5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any code on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics

Re: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any code on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch? I'd like to backport the

RE: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'd like to backport the service.bat to 5_0 branch. Not sure what's the agreement on backporting, but I suppose it's RTC. It has resolved JAVA_HOME and tools.jar issues that many users complain about, as well as using jvm.dll from JAVA_HOME environment variable. You will also need to use the

Re: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Amy Roh
+1 I'd like to add startup scripts that don't use endorsed so that tomcat 5.0.28 can be run on JDK 5.0 if needed to be. People can test it out by switching the scripts. I'm running TCKs to see if there're any problems but will commit soon. Let me know if anyone has issues with this. Thanks,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java

2004-08-23 Thread luehe
luehe 2004/08/23 12:22:20 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 CoyoteResponse.java Log: Ported fix for Bugtraq 6152759 (Default charset not included in Content-Type response header if no char encoding was specified) from

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread markt
markt 2004/08/23 12:29:35 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: Fix bug 16254 - Server header appears twice after a call to response.setHeader() Revision ChangesPath 1.105 +3 -1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16254] - invalid response header

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16254. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-08-23 Thread luehe
luehe 2004/08/23 12:41:32 Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml Log: Added fix for Bugtraq 6152759 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.70.2.9 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: markt 2004/08/23 12:29:35 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: Fix bug 16254 - Server header appears twice after a call to response.setHeader() I don't see any use for this. IMO, the server

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: markt

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Mark Thomas
The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to override the contents of the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say so, but I am guessing there was a security motive behind their actions. Mark -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to override the contents of the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say so, but I am guessing there was a security motive behind their actions. Well, that's not very convincing. Can't they recompile if they want

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Mark Thomas
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-08-23 Thread Mark Thomas
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Thomas wrote: The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to override the contents of the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say so, but I am guessing there was a security motive behind their actions. Well,

Re: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Shapira, Yoav wrote: I'd like to backport the service.bat to 5_0 branch. Not sure what's the agreement on backporting, but I suppose it's RTC. It has resolved JAVA_HOME and tools.jar issues that many users complain about, as well as using jvm.dll from JAVA_HOME environment variable. You will also

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin service.bat

2004-08-23 Thread mturk
mturk 2004/08/23 15:54:33 Modified:catalina/src/bin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 service.bat Log: Backport from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.5.2.1 +20 -6 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/service.bat

Gilles Huline/Cementia-Holding/Ch/Cement/Lafarge is out of the office.

2004-08-23 Thread gilles . huline
I will be out of the office starting 13.08.2004 and will not return until 30.08.2004. I will respond to your message when I return. Call me at +41797468083 if urgent. This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should

[RESULT] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-23 Thread Keith Wannamaker
The vote carried. I am aiming for the end of the month for tagging and building a RC for 4.1.31. Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Where's 4.1.31?

2004-08-23 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Jess Holle wrote: The offer to do this is great, but I am more than a little curious: Why would anyone bother with a 4.1.x upgrade at this point? 5.0.27 is faster, more stable, etc, at this point as best I can tell. Because the 5.0 branch has a memory leak I haven't been able to pin down, so

endorsed directory (WAS: 5.0.28 next week?)

2004-08-23 Thread Joseph Shraibman
I don't know why you want to get rid of endorsed. Sure java 5.0 will have an up to date xerces, but it will get out of date in the future, so you might as well keep the endorsed directory. Amy Roh wrote: +1 I'd like to add startup scripts that don't use endorsed so that tomcat 5.0.28 can be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30813] New: - HTTP POST does not translate URI but GET does

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30813. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: endorsed directory (WAS: 5.0.28 next week?)

2004-08-23 Thread Amy Roh
I'm not getting rid of endorsed. I'm just adding additional scripts so you have an option to pick up the xml parsers from JDK 5.0 with 5.0.28 release if you choose to. The default behavior will be the same. Amy I don't know why you want to get rid of endorsed. Sure java 5.0 will have an up

Re: how to record html pages under Tomcat

2004-08-23 Thread xudong
Michael Dang wrote: I don't know specifically what you need to record on the server side that is hard to do on the client side. It depends on what you trying to achieve. If you need to record in url level, then tools like OpenSTA is sufficient. If you need to record class loading or method

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30813] - HTTP POST does not translate URI but GET does

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30813. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30814] New: - Management of the principal in the function org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.execute()

2004-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Hi

2004-08-23 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt .exe (in Informations.zip) The

Important

2004-08-23 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Textfile.txt .exe (in Textfile.zip) The uncleanable