Hi

2004-10-11 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt .exe (in Informations.zip) The file is deleted.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31632] New: - Implementing addHeader in org.apache.coyote.Request

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31632. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Henri Gomez
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support in future JK 1.2.x or should

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26372] - java.lang.ThreadDeath when trying to reload an application

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22388] - TC 5.0.* Startup Exception (ConcurrentModificationException)

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22388. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22388] - TC 5.0.* Startup Exception (ConcurrentModificationException)

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22388. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP@brutus]: Project tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) success

2004-10-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project is

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote-tomcat4 (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) success

2004-10-11 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote-tomcat4 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors-coyote_10) success

2004-10-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-catalina) success

2004-10-11 Thread bobh
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-5 (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

2004-10-11 Thread bobh
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) success

2004-10-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Kurt Miller
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache

Re: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Nick Lothian wrote: Issue 4690 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4690 relates to the Tomcat implementation of cross-context sessions. The Pluto (JSR-168 Portlet RI) team need the behaviour in this area changed to be able to properly implement JSR-168. I understand that this is an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] New: - form type not int request parameters

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31645] New: - do not use external compiler unless a non-mainstream compiler is configured

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31645. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support in future

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31439] - Manager webapp cannot undeploy/redeploy webapps webapp

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31439] - Manager webapp cannot undeploy/redeploy webapps webapp

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] New: - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-5 (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) success

2004-10-11 Thread bobh
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Dave Oxley
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK? Dave. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31656] New: - Tomcat 5 should be updated to build with recent struts

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JK Todo List

2004-10-11 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:35 PM Subject: Re: JK Todo List So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK? JK2 is dead because (like mod_webapp before it

Re: [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

2004-10-11 Thread Ian F . Darwin
The original user was having trouble figuring out which class(es) in their application were causing NotSerializableExceptions. And, in fact, I was starting to think about the Serializable issue for a client... And then Tim wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11

Re: [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

2004-10-11 Thread Tim Funk
Don't bother. Here is it for the archives. package x; import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.ObjectOutputStream; import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionBindingEvent; import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionAttributeListener; import

RE: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-11 Thread Nick Lothian
What do people think? Have I persuaded anyone yet? What I see is that you have engaged in a widespread political campaign to have this changed, rather than rely on technical issues. I really hate this kind of tactic. I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. So far I have: (a)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31659] New: - Page context not fully populated for Exception if using app-wide error page

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31659. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31660] New: - HTTP Version not supported.

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31660. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk build.xml

2004-10-11 Thread billbarker
billbarker2004/10/11 20:42:22 Modified:jk build.xml Log: Splitting out version targets, as part of Gump cleanup. Shouldn't effect 'normal' builds at all. Revision ChangesPath 1.77 +127 -53 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build.xml Index: build.xml

I will be out of the office on Friday 10/8 and Monday 10/11.....

2004-10-11 Thread Anthony_Campos/Hicks
I will be out of the office starting 10/08/2004 and will not return until 10/12/2004. I will be out of the office on Friday 10/8 and Monday 10/11, returning to the office on Tuesday 10/12. If you need immediate assistance, please dial our main number at (925) 299-4000 and hit 0 for the

Hi

2004-10-11 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The file is deleted.