-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt
.exe (in Informations.zip)
The file is deleted.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x.
Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no
problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support
in future JK 1.2.x or should
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26372.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this project is
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote-tomcat4 *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this project
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache
1.3.x.
Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no
problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache
Nick Lothian wrote:
Issue 4690 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4690 relates
to the Tomcat implementation of cross-context sessions.
The Pluto (JSR-168 Portlet RI) team need the behaviour in this area changed
to be able to properly implement JSR-168.
I understand that this is an
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31645.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x.
Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no
problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support
in future
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but
Apache 1.3.x.
Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no
problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this project is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
Dave.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: JK Todo List
So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK?
JK2 is dead because (like mod_webapp before it
The original user was having trouble figuring out which class(es) in
their application were causing NotSerializableExceptions.
And, in fact, I was starting to think about the Serializable issue for
a client...
And then Tim wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11
Don't bother. Here is it for the archives.
package x;
import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionBindingEvent;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionAttributeListener;
import
What do people think? Have I persuaded anyone yet?
What I see is that you have engaged in a widespread political
campaign
to have this changed, rather than rely on technical issues. I really
hate this kind of tactic.
I'm not quite sure what you are referring to.
So far I have:
(a)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31660.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/10/11 20:42:22
Modified:jk build.xml
Log:
Splitting out version targets, as part of Gump cleanup.
Shouldn't effect 'normal' builds at all.
Revision ChangesPath
1.77 +127 -53 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build.xml
Index: build.xml
I will be out of the office starting 10/08/2004 and will not return until
10/12/2004.
I will be out of the office on Friday 10/8 and Monday 10/11, returning to
the office on Tuesday 10/12. If you need immediate assistance, please dial
our main number at (925) 299-4000 and hit 0 for the
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt
.exe (in Details.zip)
The file is deleted.
38 matches
Mail list logo
