To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hi
ZIP file attachments don't seem to work. I try a different format:
tar/bzip2.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Goldhahn
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 10:56 AM
To: 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
Subject: NSIS installer for JK/IIS
Hi,
I have written an installer for the
Martin Goldhahn wrote:
Hi
ZIP file attachments don't seem to work. I try a different format:
tar/bzip2.
Yes, paranoid list setting ;)
Open a bugzilla entry as enhancement for Tomcat5-Native:JK
And add the attachment there.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
Regards,
Mladen.
My initial work seems to indicate that the headers of TIFF images
being served have the size of the images more than twice what they
should be. Is that possible or likely? Thanks
--
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back.
~Dakota Jack~
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Scott Marlow wrote:
Anyway, my point is that this could be a worthwhile enhancement for
applications that run on Tomcat. What I don't understand yet is whether
the same functionality is already in Tomcat.
I should point out that some applications shouldn't limit the max number
of concurrent
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34397.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I will try to solve the problem with a filter.
You can simply call response.getWriter() in your filter if you determine
the file needs to use fileEncoding.
I have used a filter with two wrappers one for GET the other for PUT, Now Tomcat
runs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Builds and runs on both Solaris 7 8 with Apache 2.0.54.
Glenn
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:23:38PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
JK 1.2.12 has been released.
This is mostly a bug fix release over JK 1.2.10 and fixes
wc_close bug found in 1.2.11. Please see the:
Build and run on NetWare with apache 2.0.54.
JJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/6/2005 6:31 AM
Hi,
It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released.
Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been
reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning,
10:00 GMT.
Any
At 02:30 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Build and run on NetWare with apache 2.0.54.
Woot!
And thank you for the example, Jean-Jacques, of exactly why we
need more than a few days before we declare 'stable' releases ;-)
But I do think it's wonderful that the NetWare issues are gone.
What
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Cc: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Tagging 1.2.12
At 02:30 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Build and run on
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I keep
hearing the refrain Lets deprecate all this stuff I don't test.
I really can not tell what echoes on you mind ;), but if you follow
both bugzilla and tomcat-dev@ as well as tomcat-user@, you will find
out that there where no bug reports neither questions related
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill, I have been stress-testing JK for four days in my lab, since the
wc_close() bug has been fixed.I have 58 clients, each using 10 threads, doing
JSPs and servlets requests to 2 different servers (from the examples set) :
emt64, dual proc with ht enable, and Compaq proliant 8 CPUS.The new
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ich werde ab 10.05.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
12.05.2005.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden
Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte Herrn Bagehorn
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Herr Bagehorn hat die Rufnummer
0571/93425-80) Am Montag und Dienstag, den
At 05:08 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
I built and tried mod_jk against 2.0.52 and 2.1-dev. However, in these two
cases it was not tested as for 2.0.54. Stress tests were done against Tomcat
4.1.30, validation against 4.1.31. For 1.3.33, I am sorry to admit that I did
not build JK and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32141.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
29 matches
Mail list logo