Re: mod_jk multiple slashes reveals jsp code

2003-06-25 Thread Marc Slemko
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Palle Girgensohn wrote: setup: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE, apache 1.3.27 w/ mod-ssl 2.8.14, mod_jk 1.2.3 and 1.2.4. Tomcat version is irrelevant since the request never leaves apache, but anyway, it is tomcat 3.3.1a. JkMount /pp/system/*jsp [Wed Jun 25 01:32:48 2003]

Re: mod_jk multiple slashes reveals jsp code

2003-06-26 Thread Marc Slemko
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: Could we stop useless critics and flams and be more positives. I'm sorry that you think it is useless to point out the specific areas where mod_jk and mod_jk2 are doing things wrong. It's open source, and if you have objections, you're welcome to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/commonjk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h

2003-06-27 Thread Marc Slemko
On Thu, 27 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2003/06/26 19:54:18 Modified:jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h Log: Fix problem with URLs that contain //. This is essentially what Apache/httpd does in location_walk. Make sure you realize that,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/commonjk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h

2003-06-27 Thread Marc Slemko
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: If you want to be very secure, you sue Apache in front of Tomcat, and tomcats located on other machines. In such case you use ajp13, and with this configuration, I DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM with '//' since it's handle by tomcat (tested with 3.3.1a),

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-14 Thread Marc Slemko
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jan Luehe wrote: It can also be useful if you have a client that doesn't support chunked encoding - which is probably true for a _lot_ of scripting tools. If there is any other way to have the response not use chunked encoding, then I agree this is not needed. Do we

Re: URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat

2003-07-17 Thread Marc Slemko
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, P. Brewer wrote: I found the following thread from a year ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=102815260317741w=2\ Basiclly discussing a JkNotMount for excluding images and other static content from being passed to Tomcat. I can't tell that anythin was

Re: [PATCH] Performance Problems in Coyote Chunking

2003-09-12 Thread Marc Slemko
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Steve Appling wrote: The following patch combines the 3 packets that were generated for each chunk into just one packet. There are more optimizations elsewhere - I'll keep looking. Patch of