New WEBAPP/WARP sources...

2001-01-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get back home... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

FW: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors/webapplib Makefilewa.c wa.h wa_callback.c wa_callback.h wa_connection.c wa_connection.hwa_host.c wa_host.h wa_provider.c wa_provider.h wa_provider_info.cwa_provider_warp.c wa_provider_warp.h wa_request.c wa_request.h

2001-01-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
This one didn't get thru... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/ -- Forwarded Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 23 Jan 2001 18:45:17 - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: New WEBAPP/WARP sources...

2001-01-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get back home... Yeah yeah whatever... I screwed the build... SHIATZ! :( Hope to be able to fix it before

Re: New WEBAPP/WARP sources...

2001-01-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: I just added a bunch of changes to the WEBAPP/WARP sources to comply more with WatchDog. I'll be rolling a new release of the module as soon as I get back home... Pier With the latest CVS code, I get compile

FW: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/warpWarpConnection.java WarpConnectionHandler.java WarpConnector.javaWarpConstants.java WarpContext.java WarpDebug.java WarpEngine.javaWarpEngineMapper.java WarpHandler.java WarpHandlerTable.java WarpHost.javaWarpInputStream.java WarpOutputStream.java WarpPacket.java WarpReader.javaWarpRequest.java WarpRequestHandler.java WarpResponse.java WarpTable.javaMakefile

2001-01-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Another big one... -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forwarded Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 24 Jan 2001 23:11:14 - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 64409 invoked

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/warpWarpConnection.java WarpConnectionHandler.java WarpConnector.javaWarpConstants.java WarpContext.java WarpDebug.java WarpEngine.javaWarpEngineMapper.java WarpHandler.java WarpHandlerTable.java WarpHost.javaWarpInputStream.java WarpOutputStream.java WarpPacket.java WarpReader.javaWarpRequest.java WarpRequestHandler.java WarpResponse.java WarpTable.javaMakefile

2001-01-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 1/24/01 3:23 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another big one... -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] One thing that I have asked (several times now) is that commits be made smalle

Re: Thread-safety

2001-01-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
ed at least once all the time... Yep, makes sense... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/ - To unsubsc

Re: TOMCAT + mod_jk or mod_webapp

2001-01-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
ll be more than happy to consider anything, but right now I have only 6 weeks and a lot of stuff to write :) :) :) Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion

Re: mod_webapp and Win32

2001-01-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
the Unix and Win32 versions of Apache... I still need to deal with a couple of multithreaded locks in multi threaded environments... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out http://www.betaversion.org/~pier

Re: [VOTE] CVS Commit: Keith Wannamaker Keith@Wannamaker.org

2001-02-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, He has been sending lots of excellent patches as well as the fact that he already has an apache.org account. I think we should give him commit access. We need two more +1's from others with commit access. +1 :) -- Pier Fumagalli

Re: bugzilla

2001-02-02 Thread Pier Fumagalli
are the same way, hope, hope ;-). The import of the ANT and TOMCAT-3.3 bugs from BugRat is linked to an alias of [EMAIL PROTECTED], so, until those bugs don't get assigned to a "proper" owner... When they are reassigned it'll go away (shouldn't take long as far as I can see). Pier

Re: Your Bugzilla password.

2001-02-03 Thread Pier Fumagalli
... Who did that??? GR... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bugzilla and emails?

2001-02-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to get Bugzilla to email open bugs to either the list or interested individuals on an automated basis? Nope, afaik, but it might be easy to do a script that queries the DB and sends appropriate emails... Any volunteer? -- Pier

Re: Your Bugzilla password.

2001-02-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
the account on bugzilla (I believe!) Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Tomcat 4] Session Handling Enhancements

2001-02-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The session handling enhancements proposed by Kief Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] have been committed on the Tomcat 4.0 CVS repository. Way cool... Thanks Kief... -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: signals with JNI

2001-02-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
ith SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGUSR?... Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TDK and 4.0 or 4.1

2001-02-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4.1 is a development branch which is temporarily abandoned. Since it's abandoned, can't we just get rid of it? Pier -- Pier Fumagalli mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: signals with JNI

2001-02-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the same code you wrote works with SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGUSR?... Uh uh uh... So damn stupid Pier :) Now I get it, it's not because of SIGSEGV, but it's because a SIGSEGV is raised when the VM is created... :) Now I remember when I saw

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Amy Roh

2001-03-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has contributed several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the development of better admin tools,

Re: web_app in jakarta-tomcat-connectors ?

2001-05-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Quoting Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]: on 5/15/01 4:15 AM, GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didn't the jakarta-tomcat-connectors goal is to remove the connectors stuff from the servlet-engine code ? +1 in that case. Remember, +1 means that you are willing to help out. :-)

Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

2001-09-03 Thread Pier Fumagalli
George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's patch should be applied. As has been pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for the JSP and servlet JCRs. Robert LUCIER... There's no F between the I and the E... He's not an evil guy (or

Re: Service code for TC4

2001-09-03 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have searched the archives and found a check in to jakarta-tomcat-service but using anoncvs I can't checkout or even see if the module exists. Is this some sort of permissions problem. Darn... We forgot to link it to the PSERVER area :) Fixed now...

Content-Encoding vs. Transfer-Encoding

2001-09-03 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Just a brief note I thought might have been relevant for TC4 HTTP/1.1 connector... Pier -- Forwarded Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 21:28:46 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.0 (final release)

2001-09-04 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.0 (final release) -- [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan [ ] -1I am opposed

Re: Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2001/09/04]

2001-09-04 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Great... They get thru... :) (Sorry for the duplicate post on TC4, had to try it somehow!)... They're going to come every week... Pier (as always!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +---+ | Bugzilla Bug

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0Makefile.in

2001-09-04 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 01/08/31 03:26:24 Modified:webapp Makefile.in configure.in webapp/apache-1.3 Makefile.in webapp/apache-2.0 Makefile.in Log: Merge Ryan's changes with mines. JF, make install doesn┬╣t work :) Also,

Re: Tomcat fan-sites, plushies, etc

2001-09-04 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Deacon Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Are there any Tomcat fan-sites? Not support, help, etc, but _fan_ sites? Are there any Tomcat mugs, posters, plushies, etc? One of my co-workers threatens me she'll hurt me if I won't get a Tomcat plushie for her... ;/ I got several T-Shirts and

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp configure.in

2001-09-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 01/09/05 08:40:27 Modified:webapp configure.in Log: Correct a typo $ missing. They just posted a bug on that (or better, reopened a completely different one)... Check out if that's what exactly this patch fixes... Bug #2999

FW: will there ever?!

2001-09-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
We might not yet have FAN sites, but for sure this guy is going to put up a HATE site :) :) :) Dumbass :) Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Dennis Jay Dole [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 20:33:30 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: will there ever?!

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't agree with that Pier, we must try to keep compatibility with previous release of Apache 2.0, since there IS STILL NO official release. Many users are still using Apache 2.0.24-alpha (including myself), or even 2.0.18-beta (including IBM

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody will actually care unless they're testing something... And by testing good practice says get the HEAD of CVS

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another ( and better ) solution - extend JspInterceptor ( well, the code needs some cleanup - again I would recomend you do that in j34 workspace ). Then you can add the dependencies and avoid any overhead - your XSP pages will run as fast as a

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0mod_webapp.c

2001-09-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could stick with the last official tarball since that's an easy piece of thing to download. So, if the latest version is 2.0.18 alpha (don't even know since I use HEAD), The is 2.0.25 (Thank STATUS!). 20010808 is a date... I don't know about

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c

2001-09-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many users are still using Apache 2.0.24-alpha (including myself), or even 2.0.18-beta (including IBM iSeries team porting Apache 2.0). Ok, ok, I could understand your all developpers point of vue, but let me say it appears just too elitist. Not at

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm JDBCRealm.java JNDIRealm.java MemoryRealm.java

2001-09-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola Christopher: I think this change is not good, as it does *all* passwords case insensitive, regardles of the use of digest or not.., i think plain passwords need to be case sensitive .. Good catch :) Pier

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not to individuals. Edit component ... Initial owner Catalina[EMAIL PROTECTED] Connectors [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tester

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9/9/01 5:46 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not to individuals. Edit component ... Initial owner Catalina[EMAIL

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will notify the list of the bug is the weekly email. What if it is a security hole bug report and the weekly

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, personally, would like to see the full bug report e-mails when they are filed, like in the old days. And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on Nagoya... Now I'm flamed because of the opposite... I'm fucking damn

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on Nagoya... When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or general@jakarta) or was it done

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope... Because I check the web... Pier, you missed the point. I'm trying to say that you and the person assigned to the emails are potential central points of failures. Just because you don't want to click thru a couple of pages? Make me laugh c'mon...

Re: Bug reports

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's never been changed ... even in the previous installation of Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were individual names attached to Tomcat components. On the very first installation, the one on Daedalus, I remember

Re: [VOTE] New commiter Ryan Bloom

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector. Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp, showing us that connectors avoid politics :)

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot = [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s)

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ++1! I didn't even know it existed anyplace other than JTC. I have been supplying patches recently for it too. Also, having duplicate code anyplace is just a bad idea. I am on a crusade to remove all duplicate code from every code-base throughout the

Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new mailing list, it would be the

FW: [Bug 3515] - Processes hanging after stopping Tomcat

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Erich Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: method park Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:45:46 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Bug 3515] - Processes hanging after stopping Tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

FW: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:00:16 -0500 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-10 10:38 --- I

FW: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Holscher, David M [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:16:22 -0500 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup I'll RC2 first thing Wednesday. ___ David Holscher

Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and tomcat-dev is the dev list for Tomcat, so I don't see the point of

Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original suggestion. :-) -jon (runs for cover) Someone might call it I'm so freaking tired of it so that I just

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot = [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help [ ] -0I not in favor of

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan to became more than just a contributer : This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This implies that either I'm getting old

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3 I'm also worried about regression testing. Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it means

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, thank you Pier ! I believe I'm just being fair... We have our disagreements on most of the technical aspects of the code, that's why, to my disappointment too, we have TWO releases coming out in parallel, but, as I said last week to Henri, the

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Slowww down... :) If mod_jk wants to start using APR, I believe we're talking, otherwise, I'm done with cross-platform porting, I live it to Ryan Oh no you don't. I did the cross-platform stuff. I wrote APR to get awar from it. Yeah, that's why

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
William Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that there are plenty of people like me who can't even think of moving to 4.0 until it has release-quality connectors. I know... Working on it as fast as I can to fix bugs, and thank god

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mod_jk will use APR - that's certain. The only question is when and how to do the transition without affecting the stability of the code. Having an APR1.0 out is one of the requirements - I don't

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MMAP is the other scary stuff in APR, the new code (without Ralph's libmm) it no more than one month old... I need it for load balancing, but I want to double check with the guys in CA next week and see what they tell me before publishing anything..

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat f or Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm new to the list, but I like to veto things too. Somebody point me at something I can veto... :-) You can always veto your committer status... :) :) :) Pier

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat for Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no question about APR stability or release-like quality. As long as APR people are not certain the API will not change and don't put the 1.0 label on it. I have insider news on this (me and David Reid hang out pretty often together, he

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat f or Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Gomez Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm ok for that, may be by merging ajp14 and warp (ajp20). Ok... I can agree with that... We could have this protocol implementation in mod_jk and mod_webapp :) Sure do... I'm serious here... Me too... - with mod_jk, you'll gain

Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-tomcat f or Tomcat 3.3

2001-09-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something is indeed a little bizarre on the list today, mon ami. Maybe because Craig isn't here to keep us in line =) No, I believe we have to thank Jon for that... I believe that raising another flame war at this point made us all realize that

Re: Tomcat 4 Bug reports

2001-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...now go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Also tomcat 3... Pier

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docsjndi-resources-howto.xml

2001-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9/12/01 4:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +source +lt;resource-env-refgt; + lt;Descriptiongt; +Object factory for MyBean instances. + lt;/Descriptiongt; + lt;resource-env-ref-namegt; +bean/MyBeanFactory +

FW: [Bug 3543] - pageContext.include() causes Illegal to flushwithin a custom tag

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Erich Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: method park Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:16:18 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Bug 3543] - pageContext.include() causes Illegal to flush within a custom tag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gal, Developers, I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want me to take a look? No, I'm not yet working on those. I'm actually concentrating on

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may break the spec ? I could grab code from mod_jk to support that, but I'm

Re: mod_jk using warp protocol ?

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about adding warp protocol to mod_jk and may be adding with functionnalities from ajp14 ? I'm more than +1 about a merger between AJPv14 and WARP... The protocols are pretty similar... Of course in J-T-C, since mod_jk in J-T must be freezed.

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy Armstrong wrote: Hi Gal, Developers, I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want me to take a look? (Sorry to follow myself up)

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My view: It should happen only after 3.3 (and 4.0) is released, switching to APR is reasonably easy ( IMHO ), adding warp protocol is doable ( but require some changes in the request representation to use the same struct as the other jk modules

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: At the same time, since also JK is moving towards APR, but they're far behind what WebApp does ATM, let's try to refine/update/change the WebApp API, already based on APR, and work on it as the APR based

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here). This is an incremental process, and can only increase

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like a vote is in order, then. My thinking for the current approach is as follows: * If a JAR file is included in the official binary distribution of Tomcat, it needs to be put there by the standard build script. Otherwise, you end up

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all web-servers and all old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make it able to talk the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong foundation. WebApp will talk only

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 2 Available

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where could we find even mod_webapp code ? The JAVA code is compiled in... The C code comes from J-T-C and there's not yet a tag... There are few NASTY-NASTY-NASTY bugs I need to fix before going out... Pier

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like cipher suite used and bit

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GOMEZ Henri wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3611] - TEST BUG (Please Ignore)

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Release TC 3.3/4.0 DOH! :) 2) Start to think on how to merge AJP14/WARP Let me know when 3) Add the AJP14-WARP protocol to mod_jk and mod_webapp (adaptation) I'll keep track of the protocol modifications in TC4 and WebApp 4) Add APR to

Re: Tomcat Service Manager

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Here is the code for the TC Service Manager. Would anyone like to check it into jakarta-tomcat-service? ...or even just take a look at it. Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave, I'm going to check it out after I finish tackling my WebApp bugs

Re: mod_jk using warp protocol ?

2001-09-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: server_rec-hostname , the server rec is passed to you in all config functions, and the virtual host name is in there (check out mod_webapp.c in the Apache 1.3 directory, or mod_jserv)... mod_webapp requires the VirtualHostName in httpd.conf does

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3612] - getServletPath() method returnswrong value

2001-09-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3612. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

2001-09-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Pier, I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only? It's still DSO-only... Any

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

2001-09-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Pier, I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for mod_webapp with a statically linked

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

2001-09-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-) If I don't post it there, I'll forget about it in less than 5 minutes :) Now it's in my reminded bugs default query :) No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my options

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/warpConstants.java WarpConfigurationHandler.java WarpConnection.javaWarpLogger.java WarpRequestHandler.java

2001-09-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log: 4.0 final integration. GO for me... Still to do, fix Apache 1.3 under Windows (C-code in JTC only) Pier

Re: mod_webapp.so

2001-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Paxon Maina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After compiling mod_webapp.so and copying this file to the libexec directory under apache ... on testing with apachectl configtest I get the following error .. what could be the course ... Syntax error on line 976 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release

2001-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's official! The Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specifications are now final, and so is Apache Tomcat 4.0, which implements the new features of these specifications plus a host of other functionality improvements over the current production release

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3681] New: - javadoc errors

2001-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3681 Summary: javadoc errors Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0 Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal

Re: Tomcat v4.0 webapp connector module for Apache

2001-09-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Robert Daugherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the recommendation of Ted Husted I'm submitting this question to the Developers list. Please let me know if you believe it belongs elsewhere. I have recently installed Tomcat release v4.0 on a server that was already running apache. I would

Re: Solution to mod_webapp.so:undefined symbol: pthread_sigmaskon Red Hat Linux 7.1

2001-09-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:11:29AM +, Janek Bogucki wrote: Hi, I may have solved (or at least worked around) the the missing 'pthread_sigmask' symbol error encountered when trying to use mod_webapp.so. From the mailing list it appears to

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Implementing a nice administration/configuration interface (as a web app), talking to server components through a JMX interface (so that Tomcat can be managed by any JMX compliant tool). Some time ago I published some functional requirements

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have only bug fixes in 3.3.x-releases.

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I would be more in favor of releasing a 4.1 before that, focusing mostly on small refactorings of the core (like the error report refactoring I just did) and optimizations. More specifically, that would include: - the Service stuff (if

Re: [VOTE] New Committer

2001-10-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to nominate Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] for committer status. His recent contributions include several security-manager-related patches and documentation help, and appears keen to tackle the Admin Apps functionality as well. I

Re: WebApp Module daily snapshots available...

2001-10-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 10:37 am, Kazuhiro Kazama wrote: Pier, From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WebApp Module daily snapshots available... Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 03:19:05 +0100 In theory (if everything goes right as expected and I didn't screw up with my SH

Re: Adding SSL support to mod_webapp

2001-10-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have started to add SSL support to mod_webapp. I have prepared a test patch for client certificates, it works. I will now add the missing part and improve it a little: Storing the ssl_cert and other in a substructure of wa_request

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >