Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Peter Rossbach

Tested with Mac OS (10.4) , Win32 and Suse 9.3 prof.


Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues,
[ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
[ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..

 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Henri Gomez
Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Remy Maucherat

Henri Gomez wrote:

Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?


Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable at this point.

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. 

I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This time I am working 
out as best I can the critical failure point, but essentially a valid WAR is 
not being deployed and it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib 
folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom context 
listeners. On auto deploy the error yields web.xml cannot be found which is 
false. Depending on how many JARs I delete from the LIB folder, the WAR 
explodes or does not with the error.

I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the process I have gone 
through.

Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 Henri Gomez wrote:
  Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
 
 Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable 
 at this point.
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and 
may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; 
if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error 
please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action 
and avoid troubling you further.  Any views expressed in this message are those 
of the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, 
monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party.  Your 
messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be 
necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its 
reputation.  

Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS 
Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with 
your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or 
computer problems experienced.
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Sorry for jumping in this thread, but should 5.5.12 considered stable
(as it seems) are there plans to release a stable version of 5.0.x?
5.0.31 or something?

regards
Leon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
Henri Gomez wrote:
 
 Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
 

+1 for the postponement(sp?)

Also, +1 for 5.5.12 (Sol8 and Suse 9.2)

-- 
===
 Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
   If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
i take this back, it's only 5.5.9 that is exhibiting this behaviour, 5.5.12 
fully explodes the war correctly.

 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley 
 Sent: 06 October 2005 10:53
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. 
 
 I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This 
 time I am working out as best I can the critical failure 
 point, but essentially a valid WAR is not being deployed and 
 it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib 
 folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom 
 context listeners. On auto deploy the error yields web.xml 
 cannot be found which is false. Depending on how many JARs I 
 delete from the LIB folder, the WAR explodes or does not with 
 the error.
 
 I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the 
 process I have gone through.
 
 Allistair.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49
  To: Tomcat Developers List
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
  
  
  Henri Gomez wrote:
   Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
  
  Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable 
  at this point.
  
  Rémy
  
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
 Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is 
 confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended 
 solely for the named recipient only; if you are not 
 authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
 this message or any part of it. If you have received this 
 message in error please contact the sender at once so that we 
 may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you 
 further.  Any views expressed in this message are those of 
 the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to 
 record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees 
 and any third party.  Your messages shall be subject to such 
 lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in 
 order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation.  
 
 Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound 
 emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are 
 virus free or compatible with your systems and does not 
 accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer 
 problems experienced.
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand



Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues,
[ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
[ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..



-- Jeanfrancois



Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi,
I'd like to release a 5.0.31 at some point in the future, but I don't know
when, and I don't know the interest level in it.  It would certainly be fairly
small, containing only a few back-ported fixes from 5.5, no major additions or
new features.

Yoav

--- Leon Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry for jumping in this thread, but should 5.5.12 considered stable
 (as it seems) are there plans to release a stable version of 5.0.x?
 5.0.31 or something?
 
 regards
 Leon
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Remy Maucherat

Allistair Crossley wrote:

i take this back, it's only 5.5.9 that is exhibiting this behaviour,
5.5.12 fully explodes the war correctly.


I don't see any relevant changes. Who knows ...

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Remy Maucherat

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues,


It looks good enough to me.

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, will let you know 
the result.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 Yoav Shapira wrote:
  Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
  [X] Stable - no major issues,
 
 It looks good enough to me.
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and 
may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; 
if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error 
please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action 
and avoid troubling you further.  Any views expressed in this message are those 
of the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, 
monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party.  Your 
messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be 
necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its 
reputation.  

Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS 
Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with 
your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or 
computer problems experienced.
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi,

I've tested our intranet app on 5.5.12. Our application uses the following 
extensively;

NTLM authentication via IIS5/JK1.2
META-INF/context.xml configuration
8 JNDI datasources (mix of various SQL Server 2K databases and JavaMail)
Log4J
Hibernate
Spring
Struts
CMS

Seems a touch faster than usual to me but this is speculation.

The only issue that was reported is lots of these:

org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: URI was not reported to parser for entity 
[document]
at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.warn(SAXDriver.java:934)

These are only WARN level and do not appear to have affected the operation of 
the web app, however there are at least 10 of these stack traces in the logs 
which *may* confuse some users to think Tomcat is failing.

These only occur for Spring's applicationContext file which has a DTD of

!DOCTYPE beans PUBLIC -//SPRING//DTD BEAN//EN 
http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans.dtd;

My verdict based on testing is

[X] Stable - no major issues

Cheers, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley 
 Sent: 05 October 2005 10:57
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, 
 will let you know the result.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44
  To: Tomcat Developers List
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
  
  
  Yoav Shapira wrote:
   Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
   [X] Stable - no major issues,
  
  It looks good enough to me.
  
  Rémy
  
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
 Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is 
 confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended 
 solely for the named recipient only; if you are not 
 authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
 this message or any part of it. If you have received this 
 message in error please contact the sender at once so that we 
 may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you 
 further.  Any views expressed in this message are those of 
 the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to 
 record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees 
 and any third party.  Your messages shall be subject to such 
 lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in 
 order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation.  
 
 Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound 
 emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are 
 virus free or compatible with your systems and does not 
 accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer 
 problems experienced.
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Remy Maucherat

Allistair Crossley wrote:

Hi,

I've tested our intranet app on 5.5.12. Our application uses the following 
extensively;

NTLM authentication via IIS5/JK1.2
META-INF/context.xml configuration
8 JNDI datasources (mix of various SQL Server 2K databases and JavaMail)
Log4J
Hibernate
Spring
Struts
CMS

Seems a touch faster than usual to me but this is speculation.

The only issue that was reported is lots of these:

org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: URI was not reported to parser for entity 
[document]
at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.warn(SAXDriver.java:934)


I don't see how this is Tomcat related, at this point.


These are only WARN level and do not appear to have affected the operation of 
the web app, however there are at least 10 of these stack traces in the logs 
which *may* confuse some users to think Tomcat is failing.

These only occur for Spring's applicationContext file which has a DTD of

!DOCTYPE beans PUBLIC -//SPRING//DTD BEAN//EN 
	http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans.dtd;


My verdict based on testing is

[X] Stable - no major issues


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Mladen Turk

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues,
[ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
[ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..



Works like magic, really :)
Tested with tomcat-native on
WIN32, WIN64, Solaris 2.8 and SLES9/64

Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi,
It took me a bit of time to finish testing on a couple of home-brewed apps, but

[ X ] Stable - no major issues

from me.  I'll give the vote 24 more hours or so, looking good right now.  If
someone with the TCK license can run it and let us know the results, that would
be awesome.  Thanks,

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-03 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi,
Tomcat v5.5.12 has been out for a little more than a week now, so hopefully
we've had time to test it.  Please let us know what you think of its stability
below.  If anyone with the proper license could run the Servlet (v2.4) and JSP
(v2.0) TCK tests on Tomcat 5.5.12, that would be great as well.  Thank you.

Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[ ] Stable - no major issues,
[ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
[ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Stable for me

2005/10/3, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi,
 Tomcat v5.5.12 has been out for a little more than a week now, so hopefully
 we've had time to test it.  Please let us know what you think of its stability
 below.  If anyone with the proper license could run the Servlet (v2.4) and JSP
 (v2.0) TCK tests on Tomcat 5.5.12, that would be great as well.  Thank you.

 Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
 [ ] Stable - no major issues,
 [ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
 [ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..

 Yoav

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]