Given all the comments, I think we'll go with the path of least resistance
and use a SF account. Then when and if the time comes, a merge can go back
into Tomcat if there is a desire.
-Tim
Tim Funk wrote:
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy
project to be
Tim Funk wrote:
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy
project to be executed by Anders Nyman ( anders.nyman at gmail d ot
com )
The scope of the project is to let Tomcat act a reverse proxy by
extending the balancer webapp. To make it easier to get the job
At 01:25 PM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use
the tools of our organization;
I don't agree with you. The Tomcat is not place for some
'sandbox' projects.
If the ASF have some agreement with Google then it should
have
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:25 PM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
If the ASF have some agreement with Google then it should
have created a 'SoC Google sandbox' not trying to force
every project to create a 'Google sandbox'.
So it's unusual, and we aren't handing away keys to the entire
kingdom.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:25 PM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use
the tools of our organization;
I don't agree with you. The Tomcat is not place for some
'sandbox' projects.
If the ASF have some agreement
At 03:48 AM 7/12/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
Well if Tim wants to mentor that project, then fine with me.
I'm sure he will ensure the integrity of the Tomcat source
outside that 'sandbox' repository.
Exactly the point; there were no SoC participants who did not
have mentors. If this slides into
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy project
to be executed by Anders Nyman ( anders.nyman at gmail d ot com )
The scope of the project is to let Tomcat act a reverse proxy by extending
the balancer webapp. To make it easier to get the job done this summer
Hi,
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy
project
to be executed by Anders Nyman ( anders.nyman at gmail d ot com )
The scope of the project is to let Tomcat act a reverse proxy by extending
the balancer webapp. To make it easier to get the job done this
Tim Funk wrote:
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy
project to be executed by Anders Nyman ( anders.nyman at gmail d ot
com )
[ ] Sounds good to me
[ ] I'm indifferent
[X] I don't like it. Here's why
IMO the reverse proxy is a good thing to be done, and
At 12:52 PM 7/11/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
I have developed, and I am developing the majority of the code
without being connected to the CVS all the time.
It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use
the tools of our organization; and it's equally important that
we capture the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use
the tools of our organization;
I don't agree with you. The Tomcat is not place for some
'sandbox' projects.
If the ASF have some agreement with Google then it should
have created a 'SoC Google sandbox'
Tim Funk wrote:
As part of the Google SOC. Google accepted the tomcat-reverse-proxy
project to be executed by Anders Nyman ( anders.nyman at gmail d ot
com )
The scope of the project is to let Tomcat act a reverse proxy by
extending the balancer webapp. To make it easier to get the job
12 matches
Mail list logo