DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18361] - IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri

2003-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361

IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 14:17 ---
Another solution: 

Don't use IIS.  Use Apache's http server to front Tomcat.  We did this on our 
win2k servers and even noticed a marked speed improvement (and that's with 
only using the mod_proxy).  Plus we were finally able to use mod_gzip!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18361] - IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri

2003-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361

IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 14:45 ---
This one is out of question. 

The whole story happens in a multi-thousand-employees company - the inert ion 
of such a big animal is enormous. Actually the applications servers and web 
servers do not belong to the same department. We have absolutely no influence 
on what web server do the others choose, besides they have software relying on 
IIS that must be used. 

The good (and surprising) is that they take apache into account at all, just 
that it will take some time until they have tested it and found replacements 
for all the stuff they have.

And waiting until they migrate to apache is another solution that won’t work.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18361] - IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri

2003-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361

IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 14:58 ---
IIS doesn't handle forwarding very well in the first place.  This is an IIS 
limitation  - not a tomcat limitation.  You could try forwarding by path (I'm 
assuming you are using BEA's wlforward ISAPI plugin).

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18361] - IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri

2003-03-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18361

IIS doesn't like ;jsessionid within uri





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 16:01 ---
I have never stated that this were a Tomcat limitation, I was just looking for 
a feedback from Tomcat community  - and I got it. That’s okay.

OTOH IIS with its limitations is fact of life, organisations like mine also. In 
this case BEA has chosen a solution that’s easy for its customers, even if it 
doesn’t follow the standard and we were happy they did it - don’t take me 
wrong, I now Tomcat is open source and nobody gets paid for the working on it, 
contrary to people working on BEA WebLogic. 

If the migration starts and the only solution my boss accepts would be to patch 
Tomcat, would you accept a change (I already submitted patches for Eclipse for 
that matter)? Or would you say “it’s non-standard so we won’t use it”?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]