Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-11 Thread Greg Wilkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Greg Wilkins wrote: Excellent - That sounds much easier for us to keep in sync with. Still, it would be good to have a maintainer to step forward and help us with the transition It may be good for somebody on the development team to

Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-10 Thread Greg Wilkins
Costin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... The end result will be a more portable jasper - that will be usable in multiple containers with minimal pain ( and with enough hooks to allow the container to provide specific features and optimizations ). Excellent - That sounds much easier for us to

Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-10 Thread Mel Martinez
Greg, I am writing the jasper34 refactoring proposal. I am late on getting it checked in because I have been distracted by other issues (job hunting, for one). I am nearly ready to submit it though. It is currently in the form of a UML class model generated with Together. I will submit it in

RE: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-10 Thread Steve Downey
-Original Message- From: Mel Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project. other

Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-10 Thread Mel Martinez
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The "toolkit" idea is perfect for what we need, and preferably with as little coupling/dependencies as possible between components. That's the goal! For a "cooperating" container only the Jsp parser and generator ( and the runtime ) are relevant, all other

Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-10 Thread Mel Martinez
I tried to respond to this earlier today, but aparently my mail message got zapped into the netherworld. --- "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote: I am writing the jasper34 refactoring proposal. I am late on getting it checked in because I

Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-09 Thread cmanolache
Hi Greg, We are planning a small refactoring of jasper ( at least for tomcat3.3, but one goal would be to merge the 2 branches we have in jakarta ). I don't know when this will happen, but I know few people are looking into that. Mel already made a proposal for improving JspServlet, and I

Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-09 Thread Jon Stevens
on 4/9/01 2:13 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are planning a small refactoring of jasper ( at least for tomcat3.3, but one goal would be to merge the 2 branches we have in jakarta ). I don't know when this will happen, but I know few people are looking into that. Where

Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-09 Thread cmanolache
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: on 4/9/01 2:13 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are planning a small refactoring of jasper ( at least for tomcat3.3, but one goal would be to merge the 2 branches we have in jakarta ). I don't know when this will happen, but I

Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-09 Thread Jon Stevens
on 4/9/01 2:54 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: on 4/9/01 2:13 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are planning a small refactoring of jasper ( at least for tomcat3.3, but one goal would be to merge the 2 branches we

RE: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project.

2001-04-09 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: Jon Stevens To: tomcat-dev Sent: 4/9/01 6:30 PM Subject: Re: Jasper JSP maintainer required for Jetty project. on 4/9/01 2:13 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are planning a small refactoring of jasper ( at least for