On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
In Servlet 2.4 (Community Draft 2), it looks like the language in Section
9.10 that describes this hasn't changed. The basic rule is that you
combine the partial URLs specified in the welcome file list to the
incoming request for a directory
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the index.jsp that worries me - combined with precompile jsps.
That could be an extremely common case - and will fail with the
current implementation.
As a workaround, why don't you just include the JSP source files in the
war anyway?
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
It's the index.jsp that worries me - combined with precompile jsps.
That could be an extremely common case - and will fail with the
current implementation.
As a workaround, why don't you just include the JSP source files in the
war
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Index files ( was RE: cvs commit:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
At the moment, the servlet-mapping issue is somewhat of a red-herring, since
only 3.3.2-dev supports it (and even there, it is disabled by default). For
now, mod_jk(2) might as well assume that the physical jsp/vm file is there,
since Tomcat requires
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
it can already map any URI. All it has to do is:
- for each index:
Just reading the algorithm and thinking about the implementation of it. Some of
Well, don't take it as an algorithm - there
commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2mod_jk2.c
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
We have a two situations, with the TC on the same box as
apache, and
on the remote one. Well, that is only the partially
correct, cause the
load balancing
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Mladen chose the wrong example, but he is right.
Think about the case when pre-compiled JSPs are used. In this case
index.jsp is converted to a servlet - in the deployed application
there is no 'index.jsp' file, just a servlet
On 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
If there is no physical file, then nothing will get done by the patch at
all (since r-finfo.filetype is 0). It won't affect mod_dir's old
behaviour at all. I'm not sure how that changes things...
My question was: if you have a precompiled index.jsp, there
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Which is how it used to be in the old code anyway. And that means that
DirectoryIndex should not be used if you don't have physical files in the right
places (with the current patch level in mod_jk 1.2.x for Apache 2) or in virtual
places (with the
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
You don't need to ask tomcat - jk should have all the mappings, and
it can already map any URI. All it has to do is:
- for each index:
-- concatenate with the current uri
-- do the jk mapping ( or internal redirect if you use Location
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are you referring here to mod_jk2 only or both mod_jk 1.2.0 and
mod_jk2?
I think it could be done for jk2 ( but not easy ). I'm not sure
about 1.2 - just forwarding and letting tomcat handle
it is not the worse
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
it can already map any URI. All it has to do is:
- for each index:
Just reading the algorithm and thinking about the implementation of it. Some of
Well, don't take it as an algorithm - there are many other things to
consider.
DirectoryIndex
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2002/07/18 08:15:00
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the bug 10789 caused by hook order.
Thanks Mladen.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Since I didn't really like my original 'fix' for mod_jk 1.2.0 situation
(bug 9913), I tried this approach, but it seems to make no difference
whatsoever... The content of the directory is being served rather then
default pages.
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk
You should also have a look to
jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/native/location.c for the
defaultVM_PATH possible values. (The variable is named location_jvm_default there).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 2002/06/01 08:40:09
Modified:jk/native2/common
16 matches
Mail list logo
