Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Pier Fumagalli]

"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> I'll have the 3.3.2 builds back online shortly, so I should have some
>> time to help.  I'll add my +1.  If there is a specific issue you need me
>> to help with, let me know.
> 
> Thanks for the help Larry. Costin wants a small delay to test JK better, and
> I agree this would be useful (there has been some problems lately with HEAD
> and AJP). So I will delay the release for a few days.

Kewl, then maybe if my boss isn't in today as well (and the sites don't go
down for some idiotic reason) we might as well have a new build system for
webapp in place (which builds for Apache 1.3 AND 2.0 :)

(mabe, just mabe)

Pier

--
I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S.
President. B.W. Fitzpatrick



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> I'll have the 3.3.2 builds back online shortly, so I should have some
> time to help.  I'll add my +1.  If there is a specific issue you need me
> to help with, let me know.

Thanks for the help Larry. Costin wants a small delay to test JK better, and
I agree this would be useful (there has been some problems lately with HEAD
and AJP). So I will delay the release for a few days.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Bojan Smojver]

On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 01:59, Remy Maucherat wrote:


[ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
[X] +0 Yes
[ ] -1 No:


Bojan


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Larry Isaacs]

I'll have the 3.3.2 builds back online shortly, so I should have some
time to help.  I'll add my +1.  If there is a specific issue you need me
to help with, let me know.
 
Cheers,
Larry

-Original Message- 
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Mon 4/29/2002 4:07 PM 
To: Tomcat Developers List 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release



> Remy Maucherat wrote: 
> 
> > I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out 
the 
> > patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it 
> > should be merged anyway, I'll merge it. 
> > So here's the release vote, as promised earlier. 
> > 
> > I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of 
changes 
> > over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a 
> > significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would 
be 
> > a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after. 
> > 
> >  
> > [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help 
> > [X] +0 Yes 
> > [ ] -1 No: 
> > 
> >  

If nobody votes +1, this release will never happen. Not that I would really 
care, I would get more sleep :-D 
I think I need one more +1. 

Thanks, 
Remy 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 




msg26163/bin0.bin
Description: application/ms-tnef

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[costinm]

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > > [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> > > [X] +0 Yes
> > > [ ] -1 No:
> > >
> > > 
> 
> If nobody votes +1, this release will never happen. Not that I would really
> care, I would get more sleep :-D
> I think I need one more +1.

I can change my vote to +0.5 - I'll try it with jk and do some basic
testing. But I have to sleep too. 

What about postponing it for few days ( or a week ) ? 


Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Bill Barker]

> 
> [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> [X] +0 Yes
> [ ] -1 No:
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out
the
> > patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it
> > should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
> > So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
> >
> > I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of
changes
> > over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
> > significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would
be
> > a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
> >
> > 
> > [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> > [X] +0 Yes
> > [ ] -1 No:
> >
> > 

If nobody votes +1, this release will never happen. Not that I would really
care, I would get more sleep :-D
I think I need one more +1.

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Larry Isaacs]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:11 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release
> 
> 
> 
> IMPORTANT: please update the mod_jk sources from the HEAD, there is
> a bug in the apache2 support - the current .tar.gz is broken and that 
> creates a lot of pain. 
> 
> ( Larry - I don't know if 3.3.1 includes the jk from j-t-c, but if
> it does it would be helpfull to post an updated jk )

It does not currently, but I will be adding them in the near future.

Larry

> 
> Costin
> 
> 
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > 
> > > I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x 
> branch. I left out the
> > > patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. 
> If you think it
> > > should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
> > > So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
> > > 
> > > I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the 
> number of changes
> > > over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release 
> candidate. As a
> > > significant number of issues have been fixed since 
> 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
> > > a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> > > [ ] +0 Yes
> > > [ ] -1 No:
> > 
> > +0 - I have no time.
> > 
> > Costin
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:tomcat-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:tomcat-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[costinm]

IMPORTANT: please update the mod_jk sources from the HEAD, there is
a bug in the apache2 support - the current .tar.gz is broken and that 
creates a lot of pain. 

( Larry - I don't know if 3.3.1 includes the jk from j-t-c, but if
it does it would be helpfull to post an updated jk )

Costin


On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> > I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out the
> > patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it
> > should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
> > So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
> > 
> > I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of changes
> > over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
> > significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
> > a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
> > 
> > 
> > [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> > [ ] +0 Yes
> > [ ] -1 No:
> 
> +0 - I have no time.
> 
> Costin
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Glenn Nielsen]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

> I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out the
> patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it
> should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
> So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
> 
> I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of changes
> over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
> significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
> a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> [X] +0 Yes
> [ ] -1 No:
> 
> 
> 


--
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder|
MOREnet System Programming   |  * if iz ina coment.  |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */   |
--


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[costinm]

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out the
> patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it
> should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
> So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
> 
> I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of changes
> over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
> significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
> a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
> [ ] +0 Yes
> [ ] -1 No:

+0 - I have no time.

Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[Amy Roh]

+1

Amy

Remy Maucherat wrote:

>I merged the patches I wanted to merge in the 4.0.x branch. I left out the
>patch for bug 7575 in the end, as it was a bit riskier. If you think it
>should be merged anyway, I'll merge it.
>So here's the release vote, as promised earlier.
>
>I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the number of changes
>over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
>significant number of issues have been fixed since 4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
>a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
>
>
>[ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
>[ ] +0 Yes
>[ ] -1 No:
>
>
>
>Remy
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

[GOMEZ Henri]

>I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 Beta 3, and since the 
>number of changes
>over 4.0.4 Beta 2 is small, to consider it a release candidate. As a
>significant number of issues have been fixed since 
>4.0.2/4.0.3, it would be
>a good idea to plan to release 4.0.4 Final soon after.
>
>
>[ ] +1 Yes, and I'll help
>[ ] +0 Yes
>[ ] -1 No:
>

+0, not sure I could release rpm and connector stuff,
will try 4.1 snap

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: