RE: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

2004-02-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Howdy,
5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush.  But there are bug fixes and doc 
updates, which are always good to get out ;)  So I'm neutral on the date, I think next 
week is fine.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics


-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

Hi,

I think I'll tag a new build next week, picking up the bugfixes.
Any comments on this ? Or should we wait more ?

The remaining issues are for the most part with either:
- JK (with a release planned for the same date - 02/13 -, this should be
covered :) )
- the admin webapp

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

2004-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik
I think next week is a good date.
There is a pretty significant change in the clustering configuration, it is
more modular and can be easier extendable now.
Also some good bug fixes in there. Next week, definitely not later :)

Filip

- Original Message -
From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: RE: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?



Howdy,
5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush.  But there are bug fixes and
doc updates, which are always good to get out ;)  So I'm neutral on the
date, I think next week is fine.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics


-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

Hi,

I think I'll tag a new build next week, picking up the bugfixes.
Any comments on this ? Or should we wait more ?

The remaining issues are for the most part with either:
- JK (with a release planned for the same date - 02/13 -, this should be
covered :) )
- the admin webapp

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

2004-02-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy, 5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush.  But there are
bug fixes and doc updates, which are always good to get out ;)  So
I'm neutral on the date, I think next week is fine.
There are a number of significant fixes having been made since 5.0.18. 
Indeed there were few regressions or similar, so this is good.

My list of significant stuff includes:
- Bugs 26611, 26492, 26373, 26432, 26010, 26341, 26628, 26487.
- Jan's fix on RequestGroupInfo.
- The rather visible home.c syntax error in commons-deamon.
- Fixed connector shutdown.
- Allow configuring how much memory the HTTP connector uses. By default, 
it's a lot less than before. There's one related fix I'll need to do 
(dynamically resizing the buffer used for the HTTP response header), but 
it'll wait until after the tag.
- Plenty of session access optimization and invalidation fixes.

Testing of HEAD is encouraged to fix issues before the end of next week 
:) (please don't come up with your issues five minutes after I've 
finished uploading and signing the build, I won't be pleased)

I'll try to do some polish and testing of my own before the tag. Incl 
for example testing JNI with my (truted) IIS 5 install. The last time I 
did was one year ago, and I've seen classpath induced complaints about 
this on tomcat-user.

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

2004-02-06 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand


Remy Maucherat wrote:

Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Howdy, 5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush.  But there are
bug fixes and doc updates, which are always good to get out ;)  So
I'm neutral on the date, I think next week is fine.


There are a number of significant fixes having been made since 5.0.18. 
Indeed there were few regressions or similar, so this is good.

My list of significant stuff includes:
- Bugs 26611, 26492, 26373, 26432, 26010, 26341, 26628, 26487.
- Jan's fix on RequestGroupInfo.
- The rather visible home.c syntax error in commons-deamon.
- Fixed connector shutdown.
- Allow configuring how much memory the HTTP connector uses. By 
default, it's a lot less than before. There's one related fix I'll 
need to do (dynamically resizing the buffer used for the HTTP response 
header), but it'll wait until after the tag.
- Plenty of session access optimization and invalidation fixes.

Testing of HEAD is encouraged to fix issues before the end of next 
week :) (please don't come up with your issues five minutes after I've 
finished uploading and signing the build, I won't be pleased)

I'll try to do some polish and testing of my own before the tag. Incl 
for example testing JNI with my (truted) IIS 5 install. The last time 
I did was one year ago, and I've seen classpath induced complaints 
about this on tomcat-user.
+1.  I will spin the tcks again to double check we don't regress.

-- Jeanfrancois

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [5.0.19] New tag next week ?

2004-02-06 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand


Remy Maucherat wrote:

Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Howdy, 5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush.  But there are
bug fixes and doc updates, which are always good to get out ;)  So
I'm neutral on the date, I think next week is fine.


There are a number of significant fixes having been made since 5.0.18. 
Indeed there were few regressions or similar, so this is good.

My list of significant stuff includes:
- Bugs 26611, 26492, 26373, 26432, 26010, 26341, 26628, 26487.
- Jan's fix on RequestGroupInfo.
- The rather visible home.c syntax error in commons-deamon.
- Fixed connector shutdown.
- Allow configuring how much memory the HTTP connector uses. By 
default, it's a lot less than before. There's one related fix I'll 
need to do (dynamically resizing the buffer used for the HTTP response 
header), but it'll wait until after the tag.
- Plenty of session access optimization and invalidation fixes.

Testing of HEAD is encouraged to fix issues before the end of next 
week :) (please don't come up with your issues five minutes after I've 
finished uploading and signing the build, I won't be pleased)

I'll try to do some polish and testing of my own before the tag. Incl 
for example testing JNI with my (truted) IIS 5 install. The last time 
I did was one year ago, and I've seen classpath induced complaints 
about this on tomcat-user.
+1.  I will spin the tcks again to double check we don't regress.

-- Jeanfrancois

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]