Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
Binaries for iSeries uploaded main directory. Should appears in mirrors soon. 2005/7/20, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: good for me on Suse SLES 9 PowerPC. On iSeries V5R3 built without problem, waiting now for installation on our test machine. 2005/7/19, Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please vote: [X] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Functional and stress tested against 2.0.54, and 2.1.6 on NetWare 6.5 SP3 and SP4 on MP server (4 CPUS). Only stress test for apache 1.3. Using Tomcat 4.1.30. Thank you, JJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
good for me on Suse SLES 9 PowerPC. On iSeries V5R3 built without problem, waiting now for installation on our test machine. 2005/7/19, Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please vote: [X] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Functional and stress tested against 2.0.54, and 2.1.6 on NetWare 6.5 SP3 and SP4 on MP server (4 CPUS). Only stress test for apache 1.3. Using Tomcat 4.1.30. Thank you, JJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
Please vote: [X] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Functional and stress tested against 2.0.54, and 2.1.6 on NetWare 6.5 SP3 and SP4 on MP server (4 CPUS). Only stress test for apache 1.3. Using Tomcat 4.1.30. Thank you, JJ
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
At 11:08 AM 7/11/2005, jean-frederic clere wrote: JK 1.2.14 has been released. Uhm, I've said several times before you took a stab at being the RM, but no, it had not been released, it's just a tarball. You must wait for 3 +1's and more +1's than -1's before calling it released. blogs, slashdot etc are known to prematurely announce releases if the messages aren't worded correctly on the dev lists, and this has caused headaches to the httpd project on more than one occasion :) Usually I'd pick the phrase A release candidate is available at ..., please test this tarball and vote. Please vote: [X] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? So... I'll vote :) Nice work! Regression tested against both Apache 1.3 and 2.0 on Solaris 8, Linux 2.4 kernel and HPUX 11. Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
I don't know if I'm in position to vote about this, but I have been running more than a week with production servers using 1.2.14 (not .1). No problems (I have 12 sites using various tomcat versions, most of them are low-volume, however). I would say this is stable. Ari S. - Original Message - From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1 [x] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Please test and vote. Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
[x] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Please test and vote. Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
[X] Stable -- good build Thanks for volunteering for a RM! Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1
Mladen Turk wrote: [X] Stable -- good build Thanks for volunteering for a RM! You're welcome, I should do it more often it is getting more easy ;-) Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
