Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-04-06 Thread Anton Ushakov
, April 02, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem First I must say you've been extremely helpful, thank you for your prompt responses! I hate to bug you but I had another implementation question. I looked at JSSESocketFactory and how SSL is done

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-04-02 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem First I must say you've been extremely helpful, thank you for your prompt responses! I hate

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-04-02 Thread Anton Ushakov
at 13:32, Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:59 PM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem Alright, thanks Bill. I have nothing against Tomcat5

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-04-01 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:59 PM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem Alright, thanks Bill. I have nothing against Tomcat5 and indeed the socketFactory

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-03-31 Thread Anton Ushakov
this IntrospectionUtils business is confusing... On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 18:03, Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:24 PM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem Should

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-03-26 Thread Anton Ushakov
Should I make a bug entry for this? I wanted to get someone from the tomcat dev team to see if I was missing something before flagging this as a bug. thank you -anton On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:16, Anton Ushakov wrote: In CoyoteConnector.initialize() there's an assumption that if the factory

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-03-26 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:24 PM Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem Should I make a bug entry for this? I wanted to get someone from the tomcat dev team to see

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-03-24 Thread Jim Hopp
We have a similar need (though for a different reason) and extend CoyoteServerSocketFactory. We're running TC 4.1.29. Here's our Connector element: Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector port=7002 scheme=https secure=true

Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem

2004-03-24 Thread Anton Ushakov
In CoyoteConnector.initialize() there's an assumption that if the factory is an instance of CoyoteServerSocketFactory, it's gonna be SSL, and it sets secure=true. Then in Http11ConnectionHandler.checkSocketFactory() in the Http11Protocol.java, it interprets that secure flag as SSL and uses