Re: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-17 Thread Costin Manolache
' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml -Original Message- From: NormW Hmmm It seems your proposal has left everyone speechless which could mean either +1 or +0 perhaps... Norm It's probably +0 thought :) Really, I think

Re: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-15 Thread NormW
is adopted. $0.019 Norm - Original Message - From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml -Original Message- From: NormW Hmmm It seems your

RE: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-14 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: NormW Hmmm It seems your proposal has left everyone speechless which could mean either +1 or +0 perhaps... Norm It's probably +0 thought :) Really, I think it's a good solution, that doesn't change the overall appearance of the current

Re: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-14 Thread NormW
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml -Original Message- From: NormW Hmmm It seems your proposal has left everyone speechless which could mean either +1 or +0

Re: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-13 Thread NormW
Hmmm It seems your proposal has left everyone speechless which could mean either +1 or +0 perhaps... Norm - Original Message - From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 8:22 PM Subject: RE: Discussion

RE: Discussion - /jkstatus and xml

2004-04-12 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, -Original Message- From: NormW Good day All. Below is a link to a 'discussion paper' on the future use of xml for /jkstatus pages, and comes at the request of Henri. Any feedback should be to the general forum and not specifically to me.