2001, Rick Mann wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:41:41 -0700
From: Rick Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extending Server.xml configurability (for additional
classpaths)
on 8/29/01 1:15 PM
I don't understand why you would want this - doesn't the WEB-INF/lib and
WEB-INF/classes not already provide seperation of classpaths for the various
webapps. Am I missing something?
jr
I've seen lots of discussion on the user list desiring the
ability to have
additional classpaths
Rick,
For a description of the MANIFEST.MF file format, look here:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jar/basics/manifest.html
Since a .war file is kind of a jar, I don't see any reason not to adopt the
META-INF/MANIFEST.MF Class-Path: extension mechanism, unless it is
specifically
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Rick Mann wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:20:08 -0700
From: Rick Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Extending Server.xml configurability (for additional classpaths)
I've seen lots of discussion on the user list
I've seen lots of discussion on the user list desiring the
ability to have
additional classpaths available to web applications, but not necessarily
available to all web apps.
...mainly because people don't take the time to understand the class loading
mechanism, and ask for things they
