I also had some questions about how releases are made a few weeks ago.
Since we voted to pattern the releases after httpd, then I guess we are
using this document as a guideline on how to release:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html
Glenn
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/12/3 11:51 AM,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:29:54 -0800
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Project Management Committee List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL
on 2002/12/3 11:51 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED].
orgmsgNo=52475
Someone obviously hasn't been keeping up on TOMCAT-DEV mail :-).
See the discussions and vote that took place in April 2003, where the
Tomcat
on 2002/12/3 11:57 AM, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was voted on the list, Remy sent the proposal last week.
Ok, I guess I missed that email.
Sorry.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/
--
To
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 11:29, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
The last official final release was Tomcat 4.1.12
We now have a Tomcat 4.1.16 beta.
What is up with this weird release numbering? What happened to Tomcat
4.1.13? Maybe Remy got infected by Sun's marketing. I'm still curious how
Sun is
