It compiles with or without JSSE, and runs fine without an SSL
connector.
However, I haven't actually gotten around to doing the whole
keystore thing
here, so the (big) one thing I haven't tried (yet) is to run it with an
JSSE-SSL connection.
Nota to interested people that PureTLS require :
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It compiles with or without JSSE, and runs fine without an SSL connector.
However, I haven't actually gotten around to doing the whole keystore thing
here, so the (big) one thing I haven't tried (yet) is to run it with an
JSSE-SSL connection.
I just did a
The Ajp13 spec? :)
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tomcat
Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; EKR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support
It compiles with or without JSSE, and runs fine without an SSL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What remains to be done is getting jk to reuse the same abstractions
for ssl support - that would make the code
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since no one else responded, I've gone ahead and checked in Eric's changes.
I haven't actually tried to build against PureTLS, but I assume that Eric
has.
I did, but I'll check it out myself and make sure that it works.
You did check that it works in the
also be a nice feature.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since no one else responded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What remains to be done is getting jk to reuse the same abstractions
for ssl support - that would make the code cleaner. But it can wait a
while, there are bigger changes going on there.
That's what I figured. I took a look at that and it doesn't look very
difficult
Hi Eric,
I looked at the patch - it seems ok. I think we should wait few more
days for more people to have a chance to look at the code. It's great
having an SSL expert around :-)
What remains to be done is getting jk to reuse the same abstractions
for ssl support - that would make the code
