Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-21 Thread Jeff Tulley
Sorry for the late reply on this. I'd also like to help out with mod_jk2 and this move to apr. Mostly for the sake of the NetWare platform, though I need to understand the Linux connectors well as well. Let me know where I can be of service. I have a little experience with the connectors,

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Glenn Nielsen wrote: +1 I can help out. This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4, perhaps we should bump it to 2.1 or even 3.0? Since it's an 'internal rewrite', it should stay 2.x, may be 2.1 could be the right name But first we should cleanup all jk2 from #iddef APR defines

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:53 AM Subject: Re: jk2 evolution plan Glenn Nielsen wrote: +1 I can help out. This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Mladen Turk
From: Bill Barker I could get on-board with this, after Mladen's suggestion to change the return-type of most methods to jk_status_t. Without this, mod_jk2 is hopelessly broken (and I'll contunue to ignore it :). It's to apr_status_t ;-). Sill, takes a bit more time then I thought

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: From: Bill Barker I could get on-board with this, after Mladen's suggestion to change the return-type of most methods to jk_status_t. Without this, mod_jk2 is hopelessly broken (and I'll contunue to ignore it :). It's to apr_status_t ;-). Sill, takes a bit more time

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Mladen Turk
From: Henri Gomez Mladen Turk wrote: From: Bill Barker I could get on-board with this, after Mladen's suggestion to change the return-type of most methods to jk_status_t. Without this, mod_jk2 is hopelessly broken (and I'll contunue to ignore it :). It's to

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-17 Thread Glenn Nielsen
+1 I can help out. This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4, perhaps we should bump it to 2.1 or even 3.0? Glenn Henri Gomez wrote: Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR

jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). IIS uses APR by default (staticaly linked) for a long time. APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). IIS uses APR by default (staticaly linked) for a long time. APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. +1 Thanks. I can (not before friday): 1. Change all the (quasi boolean) functions to return the apr_status_t instead int (0, 1) 2. aprize jk2_log to use the apr_file_t 3. aprize

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. +1 Thanks. I can (not before friday): 1. Change all the (quasi boolean) functions to return the apr_status_t instead int (0, 1) 2. aprize jk2_log to use the apr_file_t 3.

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez You should know what apr call should be used to mimic select isn't it ? PING/PONG right? Nothing that simple :-). The magick is apr_poll. It will require some modifications to the channel in general. MT.

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez You should know what apr call should be used to mimic select isn't it ? PING/PONG right? Nothing that simple :-). The magick is apr_poll. It will require some modifications to the channel in general. hasinput method has been

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from handling all the #include for all the

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from handling all

RE: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Angus Mezick
Oh, don't forget COMPLETE documentation for everything in jkstatus! -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:59 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: jk2 evolution plan Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Done. The machine where it runs is stable but inside FSC firmwall. Could we copy it somewhere on apache.org to have it mirrored ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Done. The machine where it runs is stable but inside FSC firmwall. Could we copy it somewhere on apache.org to have it mirrored ? I have copied and adapted it to my account in minotaur. - To unsubscribe,

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Done. The machine where it runs is stable but inside FSC firmwall. Could we copy it somewhere on apache.org to have it mirrored ? I have copied and adapted it to my account in minotaur. So we'll have an URL available ?

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: And no the who's who ;) I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. Until December is very unlikely I'll have any free time. I would like to help with the unix domain channel and JNI - but it'll be very limitted... Sorry. Costin

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: And no the who's who ;) I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. Until December is very unlikely I'll have any free time. I would like to help with the unix domain channel and JNI - but it'll be very limitted... Sorry. You're more than