RE: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Forgot to ask, would you be interested in instructions/simple shell script for building mod_jk as a statically linked Apache module? Yes, certainly. Instruction and better shell script :) But did mod_jk is really faster in statically mode rather in DSO ? Bojan Dan Milstein wrote: I can't

RE: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc. Forgot to ask, would you be interested in instructions/simple shell script for building mod_jk as a statically linked Apache module? Bojan Dan Milstein wrote: I can't speak to mod_webapp, but a mod_jk response: - I understand the need

Re: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-10 Thread Bojan Smojver
Forgot to ask, would you be interested in instructions/simple shell script for building mod_jk as a statically linked Apache module? Bojan Dan Milstein wrote: I can't speak to mod_webapp, but a mod_jk response: - I understand the need for the TCP connections to be persistent in mod_jk

Re: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-09 Thread Dan Milstein
I can't speak to mod_webapp, but a mod_jk response: - I understand the need for the TCP connections to be persistent in mod_jk and mod_webapp, but I'm not sure why another connection wouldn't be attempted after the reuse of the previous connection fails; This was just added to the 3.3

Re: mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-09 Thread Bojan Smojver
Beauty. I'm actually playing with 3.3 as well, because some of the features I like (eg. realm per host) are there as well. Bojan Dan Milstein wrote: I can't speak to mod_webapp, but a mod_jk response: - I understand the need for the TCP connections to be persistent in mod_jk and

mod_webapp, mod_jk etc.

2001-04-08 Thread Bojan Smojver
restart of it might not be possible; how difficult would it be to have functionality like that in mod_webapp/mod_jk? - once again, if I'm pushed in the right direction... As you're all aware, every developer is scratching his/hers own personal itch. Nothing new here. I just kind of like Catalina's

Re: mod_webapp / mod_jk

2000-12-22 Thread Dan Milstein
Another point of mod_jk is for Dan and about the question of security and or ligth crypto support. ajp12/ajp13 didn't support ACL to accept/deny connections from a list of known host, and the protocol is in clear text. Costin suggest using SSH tunnels which be a fast work-around but I really

RE: mod_webapp / mod_jk

2000-12-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I agree that some form of authentication (and possibly encryption) are high-priority things to add to mod_jk / ajp13. Before I dive into that work, though, I want to be sure that there is a future for the code -- that's why I'm proposing using it in TC 4 as well as TC 3. Fortunately, the

RE: mod_webapp / mod_jk

2000-12-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I've builded the mod_webapp module and it fail when session are in use. May be related to cookies support. I could tell you more later after some capture with ethereal. Finally, someone actually trying it so we can fix the bugs :-) I'll try to fix whatever I can but we need a little more

mod_webapp / mod_jk

2000-12-21 Thread Dan Milstein
Pier, I wanted to ask you some questions about mod_webapp, and how you might see it working with mod_jk. I seem to have become the default ajp13 / mod_jk expert, and people have been asking for various extensions. I'm reluctant to invest much work in mod_jk/ajp13, given that TC 4.0 is using