Not sure, if you are referring to a post from me, when
I said that migration is difficult, but if so:
It *is* difficult (more or less, depending on your
configuration), because config files (server.xml)
change with every version, it seems, and the setup has
to be done all new with every new
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 06:59 schrieb Bill Barker:
Ankur Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about something, I observe, but don't
want to believe
Am Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 20:54 schrieb Ankur Shah:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about something, I observe, but don't
want to believe... ;-)
Tomcat 5 can use my keystore, but only if the password is
changeit, the default
... ;-)
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Jeanfrancois Arcand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc: Ankur Shah
Subject: Re: TC5 + SSL: Keystore password bound to default changeit?
Baer Peter Christoph
yeahsure
I just downloaded TC 5.0.16, configured SSL and ran it with no problems,
FWIW.
Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:
Yes, we set keystorePass to what we entered when
creating the keystore.
Below are the Connectors from our server.xml.
Do you see anything wrong, here? Something,
that was ok
Hi!
I have a question about something, I observe, but don't
want to believe... ;-)
Tomcat 5 can use my keystore, but only if the password is
changeit, the default password. Now, the docs say, one
should use this, but with TC 4.0.6 it was possible to
change it. Is the password hard coded in TC 5?
Hi,
before you start throwing eggs and tomatoes at me:
I *have* searched the mailing list archive before
posting this message... ;-)
I just installed Tomcat 5.0.16. Now we want to
migrate an application from TC 4.0.6 to it.
For this we need to run TC with SSL.
However, there's apparently a
?
-Original Message-
From: Baer Peter Christoph Alexander
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: SSL problem with TC 5.0.16
Hi,
before you start throwing eggs and tomatoes at me:
I *have* searched the mailing list
)
-Tim
Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:
Hi Tim,
you wrote:
snip
The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not
configurable.
/snip
So it is normal, that when we use *the same*
- Tomcat 4.0.6 LE
- JSP compiler
- J2SDK 1.4.2_01
- everything else, but OS
Hello,
forgive me if I ask something obvious, but browsing the Tomcat docs and the
mailing list archive I haven't found the relevant piece of information, yet.
We have three installations of Tomcat 4.06 LE (yes, it's old, and we are
already planning to replace it, once version 5 is mature for
Hi Tim,
you wrote:
snip
The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not configurable.
/snip
So it is normal, that when we use *the same*
- Tomcat 4.0.6 LE
- JSP compiler
- J2SDK 1.4.2_01
- everything else, but OS
the filenames on WinXP are different than on Win2k? Why?
Regards
Hi, Christopher,
you wrote:
snip
Are you sure you have the same version of the JDK and Tomcat on both
machines?
/snip
Yes, I'm sure. All installations of Tomcat and the JDK were freshly done a
second time, before I posted the phenomenon on this list. Your explanation,
why the filenames *can*
Hi,
we have a problem here that looks pretty strange to us. We have extensively
searched the mail archive and we googled a lot, but found no suitable
information. Should we nevertheless ask something obvious, please forgive
us.
Here is the problem:
Tomcat 4.0.6 LE generates HTML pages with a lot
Yes. But with my installation neither variant works --- I'd be happy
to get, at least, one running, at last...
The behaviour is different, but wrong, anyway. So my problem is not,
that one them works, the other one doesn't, but that both don't give
the expected results.
I'll try nightly builds,
Forgive me that I repost my message from several days ago, then
posted with the subject
WARP / mod_webapp not working --- help needed!
but the urgency of the problem is increasing, now.
Therefore I would kindly ask (anyone of) you, to have a look at
the log files at the end of
Hi all you,
thanks for your quick response. Before replying individually, I'd
like to post a couple of question.
Is the configuration depending on the existence of a directory or
symlink libexec?
I'm asking, because under SuSE Linux the Apache webserver modules
directory is /usr/lib/apache.
Hi all you,
thanks for your quick response. Before replying individually, I'd
like to post a couple of question.
Is the configuration depending on the existence of a directory or
symlink libexec?
I'm asking, because under SuSE Linux the Apache webserver modules
directory is /usr/lib/apache.
Your problem appears to be caused by this:
The directory structure of SuSE differs from the one
used by Red Hat, despite the fact that both are moving
towards LSB and FHS standards compliance.
In addition, some files of TC4 are in different places
compared to TC3, now. Eg, there's a file in
18 matches
Mail list logo
