than Apache 1.3.14 all the built-in modules have .so
endings instead of .dll endings. Windows doesn't care what the ending
is...either will work if referenced properly in the LoadModule command.
-Ellis Teer
Hi
I've installed Apache 1.3.20 on a win2000 pc and it works
fine. Now i want
Tomcat
attractive.
-Ellis Teer
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, chris brown wrote:
Just wondering what's being planned for the future of Tomcat beyond the 4.0
release (if anyone knows...). For example, are there plans to make a
release that uses JDK 1.4's scalable I/O features? (as both products are
currently
Now I am reading the JMX spec...but my first itch is to install a UNIX based OS
on my servers ;)
-Ellis Teer
Just had to say that Tomcat is a fine piece of work.
I am looking forward to the mod_webapp Apache-Tomcat connector.
It's working great under Unix :)
Although it may be before its
to session track
static (non jsp/servlet) resources that tomcat delivers.
-Ellis Teer
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:55:09 +0100 (BST), Ros wrote:
My site *has* to track sessions whilst allowing users to disable
cookies.
In development so far i've been using tomcat with apache (using
mod_jk).
This isn't going
Thanks Jeff and guyr,
Can I rename the current mod_jk.dll to mod_jk.so? Are they identical and it's
just a name extension change that occurred between 1.3.14 and 1.3.15. I
checked the downloads of Jakarta and Apache.org and didn't find a mod_jk.so
binary for Win2k.
-Ellis Teer
On Mon, 16 Apr
the server
starts.
I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. Is this a change
in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll file for Win32?
-Ellis Teer
