RE: Same specification, different behavior ? what shall I do?

If the problem is just too many tags on one page, breaking that page into multiple pages and using jsp:include should solve the problem. -- Martin Cooper -Original Message- From: Vernon Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: RE: Same specification, different behavior ? what shall Ido?

-Original Message- From: Vernon Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:53 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List'; Martin Cooper Subject: Re: RE: Same specification, different behavior ? what shall I do? Yes, that is the other solution. But I would like to use

RE: tomcat v. resin

. What sort of serious feature restrictions? Are they Servlet / JSP related, or related to Resin-specific functionality? -- Martin Cooper At 05:30 PM 9/6/2002 -0700, you wrote: Hey does anyone here have an opinion on Resin versus Tomcat? I've heard that Resin is screaming fast but I never see

RE: tomcat v. resin

, then you're tied to Resin. You might want to ask this question on the resin-interest list to see what kind of responses you get from the Resin side of the house. -- Martin Cooper -Original Message- From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:30 PM To: Tomcat Users

RE: tomcat v. resin

implementation, so they'll reject Resin for no other reason than because it's not the standard. Sad but true... -- Martin Cooper Neal -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:42 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat v

RE: altering the request URI in a filter

with the RequestDispatcher, as someone else suggested. -- Martin Cooper -Original Message- From: jfc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 6:26 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: altering the request URI in a filter Martin Cooper wrote: -Original

RE: Tomcat and select multiple

multiple, or two checkboxes with the same name? The first value will be available to you through getParameter(), and you can get them all using getParameterValues(). -- Martin Cooper -- -Josh And can you tell me, doctor, why I still can't get to sleep? And why the Channel Seven chopper

RE: altering the request URI in a filter

any setter methods or any fields which can be used to hold the new value. The only setters I can see are setAttribute and setRequest. Since you're the one implementing the wrapper class, you can choose to add whatever methods you see fit. -- Martin Cooper jfc -- To unsubscribe

RE: Poolmam vs. Tomcat's JNDI (DBCP, Pool)

it out as far as I'm concerned. Actually, it is. Although it's no longer being supported through the CodeStudio site, PoolMan is alive and well on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/poolman/ -- Martin Cooper When you refer to tomcat's JNDI, I suppose you mean the commons-DBCP

Confused about Tomcat version numbering

base for the ongoing development of that version? Thanks! -- Martin Cooper -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]