Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-14 Thread Spam
I guess if you put the JkMount inside virtual host 172.16.16.10:80 , the JkMount is only valid for port 80. Put JkMount outside any virtual host ... should make it valid for all ports (included port 443). Whatever it looks around httpd.conf misconfiguration. Try this: IfModule mod_jk.c

Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-14 Thread Spam
You don't say if the displaying of images problem is related to port 80, 8080 or 443 (or any combination of these ports). I guess it's ok for port 8080. Try to display one image by using the full URL, example: https://localhost/appserver/myapp/img/viewmag.gif and

Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-13 Thread Spam
Hi, It should not depend on the port you use to connect to apache. Both http://myserver.com/index.jsp and https://myserver.com/index.jsp should have the same result with no specific configuration. I've configured mod_jk to redirect all .../appserver/* to tomcat. Then whatever I use

Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-13 Thread Spam
code, how exactly you specify this .../appserver/* Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:35:08 +0100 From: Spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache + tomcat +ssl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi, It should not depend on the port you use to connect to apache. Both http

Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-13 Thread Spam
Do you mean it's working (both port 80 and 443) when apache is listening to port 80, but not any more since you stopped listening from this port? Whatever you have mentionned you have a firewall? Why don't you block port 80 using firewall and let apache in its standard configuration? Johann

Re: Apache + tomcat +ssl

2004-01-13 Thread Spam
Apache is used to support SSL requests, in this configuration no need for tomcat to know about https. (of course traffic between apache and tomcat is not encrypted) I guess port 8443 is used only when tomcat is stand-alone (or for paranoiac ;-) ). Server Error Is it a message issued by tomcat

Re: Tomcat don't receive the right URL from mod_jk2 (or mod_jk) with IIS 6.0 on Win 2003 Server?

2004-01-12 Thread Spam
not be. Daniel Schmitt wrote: Hi Spam, Haven't read your log in detail. two points: filename of the jk2 redirector is isapi_redirector2.dll, so isapi_redirector.dll will never be found, example directorys of Tomcat5 are servlets-examples and jsp-examples, so an examples directory will never

Re: Tomcat don't receive the right URL from mod_jk2 (or mod_jk) with IIS 6.0 on Win 2003 Server?

2004-01-09 Thread Spam
] workersFile=C:\\Dvp\\Tomcat4.1\\conf\\workers2.properties extensionUri=/jakarta/isapi_redirector2.dll logLevel=DEBUG serverRoot=C:\\Dvp\\Tomcat4.1 authComplete=0 threadPool=20 @=C:\\Dvp\\Tomcat4.1 Daniel Schmitt wrote: Hi Spam, Haven't read your log in detail. two points: filename of the jk2

Re: Tomact 4.1.29 connection poolingusing JNDI! Please help a newbie

2004-01-07 Thread Spam
It looks more like an Oracle jdbc problem rather than Tomcat problem. Please have a look at the error description: http://questsupportlink.quest.com/ConnectionAssistant/ora12505.asp Are you sure your URI is valid? jdbc:oracle:thin:@dpwdev02:1521:dprd Especially the dprd which should be the

Re: Differences Between Apache and Tomcat

2004-01-06 Thread Spam
Hi, Apache is a web server (mainly support static html). Tomcat is a servlet container (mainly support servlets, and by the way jsp, but don't support EJBs). JBoss is an EJB container (support EJBs, and is using tomcat as embedded component to support servlets and jsp). All of them can work

Tomcat don't receive the right URL from mod_jk2 (or mod_jk) with IIS 6.0 on Win 2003 Server?

2004-01-06 Thread Spam
Hi all, I've followed the instructions found at: http://virtualict.net/support/kb/iis6-Tomcat5-JK2.html But, I get ' The page cannot be displayed ' when trying to reach: http://localhost/examples/ Looking at the asapi.log file, it seems that /examples/ is found to be redirected to

security hole on windows tomcat?

2003-08-14 Thread Spam Email
I came across what appears to be a security hole when running tomcat. I'm not sure how widespread it is, but my linux server is safe, yet my windows XP, tomcat 4.1.24 is vulnerable. I found that if you append %20 to a jsp page it shows the source code instead of displaying the page: