Re: Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-11 Thread Jon Wingfield
In that case your doctype is still wrong! Tomcat has a Catalog of DTDs which it resolves based on the supplied Public Identifier. I run our app just fine on my laptop with no internet connection. You have a typo in your Public Identifier: "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JSP Tag Library 1.2/EN" s

Re: Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Hehl
I started off with that, but the computer I'm working from does not have internet access. You get a specific error message for DTD not found for that one. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. I moved the DTD from the internet to the below path to fix the problem. Anyone else? --- Jon Wingfi

Re: Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-10 Thread Jon Wingfield
Oops. Right you are. Didn't read the error message ;( Looks like the taglibs dtd wasn't found. Try http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd";> at the start of your tablib file. (sorry about the line-wrap) Jon Thomas Hehl wrote: I started with that, and it produced the same results. I

Re: Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Hehl
I started with that, and it produced the same results. I then coded it as it is to eliminate the web.xml from being the problem. --- Jon Wingfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Put a taglib entry in your web.xml: > > > your_uri_here > /WEB-INF/taglib.tld > > >and change your jsp page:

Re: Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-10 Thread Jon Wingfield
Put a taglib entry in your web.xml: your_uri_here /WEB-INF/taglib.tld and change your jsp page: <%@ taglib uri="your_uri_here" prefix="ft" %> As per section JSP.7.3.6.3 of the JSP 1.2 specification, available here: http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr053/ Also: h

Annoying taglib problem

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Hehl
I have never used taglibs before. Be warned!:) New setup of tomcat 4.12. The tag itself is stored in WEB-INF/lib/forerunner-webapps.jar, but the error is the same whether the jar file is there or not. I simply don't know where to look next. I am getting the following error (edited): 2003-09-09