This is not a valid address at SNL Securities (http://www.snl.com).  Please remove 
him/her from your mailing list or address book.


Your message reads:

Received: from snlexch.snl.com (unverified [10.0.1.9]) by mail.snl.com
 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:41:29 -0500
Received: by SNLEXCH with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
        id <F3WAVK1S>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:39:09 -0500
Received: from mail.snl.com (SNLDMZBDC [10.0.0.7]) by snlexch.snl.com with SMTP 
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
        id F3WAVK1R; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:39:08 -0500
Received: from apache.org (unverified [64.208.42.41]) by mail.snl.com
 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:41:27 -0500
Received: (qmail 11801 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2001 17:00:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 11762 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2001 17:00:32 -0000
Received: from zurcherortho.com (128.121.229.20)
  by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2001 17:00:32 -0000
Received: from s807 (proxy.benlife.com [63.225.52.2]) by zurcherortho.com (8.8.8) id 
KAA33599 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:00:21 -0700 (MST)
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <002501c09cf0$f43482a0$3c01200a@s807>
From: "Ben Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help:What type of a configuration Tomcat is more preferable to industrial use
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:59:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

>     Hi !
>     What advantages gives use Tomcat + Apache? Why recommend using Tomcat
as stand-alone
> container mainly for development and debugging ?

Tomcat is excellent at serving up dynamic content (i.e. servlets) and does a
pretty good job at serving up static content (i.e. HTML, GIF, JPG, etc).
However, if you are expecting a high level of simultaneous hits (where "high
level" varies according to the performance of your hardware), using Apache
with Tomcat offloads all requests for static content from Tomcat to Apache,
which frees up Tomcat's resources to respond only to dynamic requests.

Because each server configuration is unique, you should take some time to
stress test your Tomcat configuration and learn what its performance
limitations are.  Another thread recently recommended JMeter for such a
task.  Let me also add Microsoft's WAS (not WCAT) to the list.  Check it out
at http://homer.rte.microsoft.com/.  Of course, it's Win32 only.

Good luck,

Ben


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to