Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-07 Thread tim leung
request. This is WHY java back-ends have better performance and are scalable. -Original Message- From: tim leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am

Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-07 Thread tim leung
request. This is WHY java back-ends have better performance and are scalable. -Original Message- From: tim leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am

Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-06 Thread James Klicman
and are scalable. -Original Message- From: tim leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am thinking of write an unix app that will get data from a pipe e.g

JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread tim leung
Hi, I am thinking of write an unix app that will get data from a pipe e.g. | and then will do a HTTP POST to some server. e.g. command1 | java PipeReader-- OR -- e.g. command1 | perl PipeReader Assume I need to invoke the JVM process or PERL process very frequently (

Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread Jeff Kilbride
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am thinking of write an unix app that will get data from a pipe e.g. | and then will do a HTTP POST to some server. e.g. command1 | java PipeReader

RE: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread Danny Angus
your requests out of the input), but java does threads and OO nicely. -Original Message- From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 8:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Wouldn't it be easier to create a daemon

RE: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread Ross Dyson
The JVM is loaded just ONCE not once pre request. This is WHY java back-ends have better performance and are scalable. -Original Message- From: tim leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi

RE: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread tim leung
: Sunday, 6 May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am thinking of write an unix app that will get data from a pipe e.g. | and then will do a HTTP POST to some server. e.g. command1 | java PipeReader-- OR -- e.g

Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread Eric Fialkowski
Just one idea that isn't completely thought through so forgive me if this is ludicrous How about piping the output from the log into a FIFO/named pipe (read the man page for mknod if you're not sure what that is). Then you could have a background process that is reading from the pipe. That

Re: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory

2001-05-05 Thread David Crooke
May 2001 4:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAVA vs. PERL startup time + memory Hi, I am thinking of write an unix app that will get data from a pipe e.g. | and then will do a HTTP POST to some server. e.g. command1 | java PipeReader-- OR -- e.g