As I recall, TC 3.2.x only has a HTTP/1.0 Connector. In particular, it
never respects HTTP keep-alives.
"Jamie Spurr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know the property in the server.xml file on Tomcat for
switching off http keep-alives? I'm using version
Does anyone know the property in the server.xml file on Tomcat for
switching off http keep-alives? I'm using version 3.2.1. I can't find a
listing for this deprecated version -
Thanks,
Jamie.
**
Discla
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:55:48 -0800
(BAlex Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(B
(B> I am using Tomcat as my web server. I am using AXIS for SOAP. I notice
(B> via ethereal that the are a lot of
(B> port opening from the client side for the HTTP (SOAP) requests. I would
(B> like to keep the s
I am using Tomcat as my web server. I am using AXIS for SOAP. I notice
via ethereal that the are a lot of
port opening from the client side for the HTTP (SOAP) requests. I would
like to keep the socket open
for the client. How do I make the tomcat server keep the socket open?
Is there a setti
he TCP/IP connections
keep getting closed even though I am sending a HTTP header indicating keep
alive. I would greatly appreciate any help on this issue.
Tim McClure
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
I am running Tomcat standalone with SSL turned on but the TCP/IP connections keep
getting closed even though I am sending a HTTP header indicating keep alive. I would
greatly appreciate any help on this issue.
Tim McClure
Er..
Why is this attribute nowhere in the TC docs??
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2003 07:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: KEEP-ALIVE
If you are using the CoyoteConnector (the default for 4.1.x), then set the
maxKeepAliveRequests=&q
are using TomCat without Apache and using http 1.1
> I would like to disconnect keep alive to make a workaround.
> I cannot find a way to do this.
> Can you please help me?
>
> Best Regards
> Carlos Belo
>
--
>
> We are using TomCat without Apache and using http 1.1
> I would like to disconnect keep alive to make a workaround.
> I cannot find a way to do this.
> Can you please help me?
>
> Best Regard
I am using tomcat 4.0.3. According to documentation it supports
Connection:Keep-alive. But when i send a request with that option server is
returning Connection:Close(Client with HTTP 1.1). Why is this happening.
_
The new MSN 8: ad
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bill Barker wrote:
| There is a problem with HTTP/1.0 Keep-Alive in 4.1.12. See
| http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12783 for more
| information. If this looks like your problem, then upgrading to 4.1.18
| should fix it.
Thanks a lot. I am actually using
There is a problem with HTTP/1.0 Keep-Alive in 4.1.12. See
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12783 for more
information. If this looks like your problem, then upgrading to 4.1.18
should fix it.
"Endre Stølsvik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECT
It is a connection-level authentication mechanism, rather
than a session-oriented mechanism, probably violating a dozen RFCs.
However, this requires that the server does "Keep-Alive" connections.
The whole system works like a charm with HTTP 1.1, where Tomcat is eager
to do keep-alive. But,
within Tomcat?
It is possible to config. I believe that the attribute is
"connectionTimeout" for 4.0.x, and "soTimeout" for 4.1.x. 4.1.x also has a
"maxKeepAliveRequests" attribute that can be used to effectively disable
keep-alive (by setting it to 1).
>
> Tha
Hi,
Does Tomcat use HTTP keey alive by default? In other
words, Tomcat does not close the socket connection
with the client AFTER the servlet finishes the doGet()
or doPut() call?
If yes, is this a Tomcat specified implementation? Or
it is defined in the Servlet spec? Also, is it
possible to con
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Keep-Alive. Was: IE 5 on Mac is incompatible with TC 4?
Rob,
I'm not sure I understand what you want, but regarding session cookies,
IE5/Mac and SSL, I think that the problem is that TC 4 does not
Rob,
I'm not sure I understand what you want, but regarding session cookies,
IE5/Mac and SSL, I think that the problem is that TC 4 does not seem to
automatically support persistant TCP-connections which both gives bad
performance, and confuses at least one browser to the extent that it
stops send
fers between the TC and IIS-headers I supplied:
TC does Connection: Close while IIS does Connection: Keep-Alive.
This could very well be the reason why ";Secure" is added (which *may*
be the culprit although IE 5/Mac ought to be capable of handling this) as
a closed-down connection loses its
Does Tomcat support keep-alive socket connections?
Tim
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: windows 2K + IIS 5.0 + cgi program + HTTP connection Keep Alive
doesn't work
Sorry for the late reply. Can you post this question on the newsgroup?
It would be a great help, as you can probably imagine I must account for
how I spend my t
20 matches
Mail list logo
