Re: Lb_factor didn't work as expected

2003-03-31 Thread karthikeyan.balasubramanian
PM Subject: Lb_factor didn't work as expected After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we noticed that if we define workers.properties as follow the load balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio. For example if we stress with 100 users, 80

RE: RE : Lb_factor didn't work as expected

2003-03-24 Thread Kwong Chong
, 23 March 2003 0:14 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE : Lb_factor didn't work as expected Yes, we are using the worker MPM and the behavior mentionned in my initial mail if we use the same lb_factor value 1. Eric LAGALISSE -Message d'origine- De : Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Lb_factor didn't work as expected

2003-03-22 Thread Bill Barker
Which MPM are you using? AFAIK, the load balancing only works currently with the 'worker' MPM. LAGALISSE Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we noticed that if we define workers.properties as follow

RE : Lb_factor didn't work as expected

2003-03-22 Thread LAGALISSE Eric
Yes, we are using the worker MPM and the behavior mentionned in my initial mail if we use the same lb_factor value 1. Eric LAGALISSE -Message d'origine- De : Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : samedi 22 mars 2003 09:59 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Lb_factor didn't work

Lb_factor didn't work as expected

2003-03-21 Thread LAGALISSE Eric
After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we noticed that if we define workers.properties as followthe load balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio. For example if we stress with 100 users, 80 are routed to the first tomcat server declared