Mozilla crashes Tomcat.

2002-11-29 Thread Christopher Mark Balz
Mozilla 1.x/N6+ causes a devastating memory leak on Tomcat 3.2.4. In side-by-side tests, IE 5.5 causes no such leak, but Moz1.x/N6+ cause Tomcat to simply start allocating memory until the heap size limit is exceeded by about 20MB, resulting in an eventual shutdown of the JVM. I'm pretty sure

RE: Mozilla crashes Tomcat.

2002-11-29 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
implementation that has the leak. BTW: tc 3.2 is quite outdated. Maybe you should upgrade to 3.3.* or 4.*. -Original Message- From: Christopher Mark Balz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mozilla crashes Tomcat. I'm

Re: Mozilla crashes Tomcat.

2002-11-29 Thread David Brown
Christopher Mark Balz writes: Mozilla 1.x/N6+ causes a devastating memory leak on Tomcat 3.2.4. In side-by-side tests, IE 5.5 causes no such leak, but Moz1.x/N6+ cause Tomcat to simply start allocating memory until the heap size limit is exceeded by about 20MB, resulting in an eventual

Re: Mozilla crashes Tomcat.

2002-11-29 Thread Christopher Mark Balz
Mark Balz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mozilla crashes Tomcat. I'm pretty sure it's not my code since the leak starts immediately on secure (ssl) session log-in to a static page (no servlet action whatsoever). If a Moz/N6+ browser

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-29 Thread Vincent Stoessel
One thing to remeber about the way Mozilla does view source. when you ask Mozilla to view source it wil pop up a new window and then do a new GET request on that page. This can really screw you on a page with posted data from a form submission. This differs from IE and Netscape 4.x series. IE

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-24 Thread Lloyd Llewellyn
Speaking of Mozilla - I've noticed that using Mozilla on Windows to test my web apps seems rather slow. It takes a couple seconds to render the pages. Since I use Mozilla almost exclusively, I thought this was just database processing on the server. When one day I happened to use IE, though,

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-24 Thread Lloyd Llewellyn
So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat produces: htmlbody/body/html It might have nothing to do with it, but just yesterday I had Netscape6 produce that very page, when it shouldn't have. I was obtaining a personal certificate from Thawte and N6 gave

Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread John Baker
successfully against Tomcat 4.0b7 without seeing this type of problem. Reply Separator Subject:Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/22/2001 1:23 PM On Wednesday 22 August 2001 00:38 am, you wrote

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Rob S.
I'd be glad to run the same test here. What version of Mozilla, Tomcat, setup, source code, etc.? - r On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:28:55 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat produces: htmlbody/body/html for no apparent reason

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread John Baker
On Thursday 23 August 2001 15:14 pm, you wrote: I'd be glad to run the same test here. What version of Mozilla, Tomcat, setup, source code, etc.? Well any jsp. Mozilla 0.9.3 or above (I am running a nightly but 0.9.3) will do. Tomcat 4.0.b7 (and I think b6 was affected as well, but try b7

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Baker wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:28:55 +0100 From: John Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mozilla and Tomcat So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat produces: htmlbody/body

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Lloyd Llewellyn
So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat produces: htmlbody/body/html If you have a reproducible test case of this (or any other problem), the best thing to do is submit a bug report: FWIW, I've experienced this several times using Tomcat. It's always

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Rob S.
: On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Baker wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:28:55 +0100 From: John Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mozilla and Tomcat So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat produces

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Kevin HaleBoyes
would pound (ok, click firmly) on the reload button and after several attempts, the page would load properly. I'm afraid I don't remember what page was displayed when it didn't work. I tried restarting Tomcat and Mozilla in various combinations but it didn't help. I also recompiled my application

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Rob S.
Once I got rid of 0.9.3 and reinstalled 0.9.2 life was good again. I've since upgraded to Tomcat 4.0b7 and am staying with Mozilla 0.9.2 and life is still good. Cool, some corroboration that 0.9.3 has some issues remaining to be worked out =) - r

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Thad Humphries
Beware! Mozilla 0.9.3 solved a major bug we were encountering with earlier versions of 0.9.x--session information was getting lost when the an applet was loaded with the Java plug-in (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79851). At 13:03 8/23/2001 -0700, you wrote: Once I got rid of

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-23 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
- Original Message - From: "Lloyd Llewellyn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "tomcat-user" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:36 PM Subject: Re: Mozilla and Tomcat So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat pro

Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-22 Thread John Baker
Subject:Re: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/21/2001 11:45 PM Hello. We're getting off topic here. I have caching turned offf, however why would mozilla print htmlbody/body/html when the JSP page doesnt produce that (well it does, but with a load of other

RE: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-22 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Yeah, IE has a wicked sticky cache. interestigly i never had problems with the cache of ie. but i had problems with mozilla and ns6, until i inserted a no-cache meta tag. michael

Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-22 Thread Jonathan Pierce
browser cache 3. Test the example and see whether you are still having the issue. I have used netscape and ie successfully against Tomcat 4.0b7 without seeing this type of problem. Reply Separator Subject:Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat Author

Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-22 Thread John Baker
]: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/22/2001 1:23 PM On Wednesday 22 August 2001 00:38 am, you wrote: It sounds like a problem in your jsp or servlet. It looks like your response is not being truncated, since you get your /html tag. Make sure to flush the output

Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-21 Thread John Baker
Hello. Ever since the Mozilla builds between 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 (and I mean all builds, including 0.9.3), I have experienced some problems with redering Tomcat generated pages. If I change a jsp (I have reloadable on for development) then I will often see just this when the page reloads:

Re: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-21 Thread Jonathan Eric Miller
Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:13 PM Subject: Mozilla and Tomcat Hello. Ever since the Mozilla builds between 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 (and I mean all builds, including 0.9.3), I have experienced some problems with redering Tomcat generated pages. If I

Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-21 Thread Jonathan Pierce
, No-cache); response.setDateHeader(Expires, 0); response.setHeader(Cache-Control, no-cache); Reply Separator Subject:Re: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/21/2001 1:55 PM At 01:50 PM 8/21/2001, you wrote: I've ran into similar

Re: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-21 Thread John Baker
); response.setHeader(Cache-Control, no-cache); Reply Separator Subject:Re: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/21/2001 1:55 PM At 01:50 PM 8/21/2001, you wrote: I've ran into similar problems with Internet Explorer. Not exactly

Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat

2001-08-21 Thread Jonathan Pierce
Separator Subject:Re: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/21/2001 11:45 PM Hello. We're getting off topic here. I have caching turned offf, however why would mozilla print htmlbody/body/html when the JSP page doesnt produce that (well it does