RE: [FAQ] : ( Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-13 Thread Bentzy Sagiv
Uri mapping, so the workers2.properties file is read! -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : ( Sounds good to me. John On Thu

RE: [FAQ] : ( Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-13 Thread Simon Pabst
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : ( Sounds good to me. John On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:10:03 -0400 (EDT), Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I throw this against the wall and see

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-11 Thread Tim Funk
Works for me - its added. -Tim Eric J. Pinnell wrote: I throw this against the wall and see what sticks... JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my workers2.properties file such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat, what's wrong? JK2 is not finding your

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-11 Thread John Turner
Sounds good to me. John On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:10:03 -0400 (EDT), Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I throw this against the wall and see what sticks... JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my workers2.properties file such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
I think it's a good idea. It should be noted that this setting isn't RH8 specific. I had to use it on Solaris. -e On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, John Turner wrote: This should probably go in the FAQ under miscellaneous. John On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:29:48 -0400 (EDT), Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL

RE: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread Bentzy Sagiv
Please the link to the FAQ - miscellaneous -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : ( This should probably go in the FAQ under

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread John Turner
Subject: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : ( This should probably go in the FAQ under miscellaneous. John On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:29:48 -0400 (EDT), Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think we did this last week... with RH8. The solution was to put

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread Tim Funk
Duly noted (now I just have to read the what is below (and the rest of the thread) -Tim John Turner wrote: This should probably go in the FAQ under miscellaneous. John On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:29:48 -0400 (EDT), Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think we did this last week...

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread Tim Funk
OK - I read the thread. Can someone summarize this one into a question and answer? -Tim Tim Funk wrote: Duly noted (now I just have to read the what is below (and the rest of the thread) -Tim John Turner wrote: This should probably go in the FAQ under miscellaneous. John On Thu, 10 Jul

Re: [FAQ] Re: Apache 2.0.43 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat 4.1.24 on LINUX RH8 : (

2003-07-10 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
I throw this against the wall and see what sticks... JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my workers2.properties file such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat, what's wrong? JK2 is not finding your workers2.properties file. Specify it's location in your