RE: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread guyr
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c Windows doesn't require DLLs to have a .dll extension. -Original Message- From: e_teer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AddModule mod_jk.c Hey Eric, LoadModule loads the module

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread Jeff Kilbride
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c I believe they changed the extensions from .dll to .so in Apache 1.3.15 and up. --jeff - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:16 AM Subject: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread Ellis Teer
2001 10:12:31 -0700, Jeff Kilbride wrote:  RE: AddModule mod_jk.c      I believe they changed the extensions from .dll to  ..so in Apache 1.3.15 and up.     --jeff      - Original Message -   From:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:16  AM

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread Jeff Kilbride
Ellis Teer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:14 PM Subject: Re: AddModule mod_jk.c Thanks Jeff and guyr, Can I rename the current mod_jk.dll to mod_jk.so? Are they identical and it's just a name extension change that occurred between 1.3.14 and

RE: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread guyr
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c No, you can't just rename DLL files. Windows stores a library name inside the DLL, and it gets bothered if the current DLL name doesn't match the name stored inside the DLL. mod_jk.so works as a DLL because it was built as mod_jk.so. So a more exact wording of my

RE: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-16 Thread Tim O'Neil
At 05:46 PM 4/16/2001 -0400, you wrote: No, you can't just rename DLL files. Windows stores a "library" name inside the DLL, and it gets bothered if the current DLL name doesn't match the name stored inside the DLL. mod_jk.so works as a DLL because it was built as mod_jk.so. So a more

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-15 Thread eric leung
thanks jeff, i had read this already, but i am still not very clear about difference between the 2. what i think is addmodule will add the module to the list. you can't use the module until you use the LoadModule command to load the module into memeory. you don't need to use AddModule before

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-15 Thread e_teer
Hey Eric, LoadModule loads the module into memory and AddModule makes it available for use. You do need both except when the module is already built into Apache which several are in the Win32 version, in this case you only need the AddModule. However, it was my understanding that .so files are

Re: AddModule mod_jk.c

2001-04-14 Thread Jeff Kilbride
Did you try the docs? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#addmodule http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_so.html#loadmodule --jeff - Original Message - From: "brian luk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 2:16 PM Subject: AddModule mod_jk.c