As I understand Apache is more stable ( tested
bytime )
- Original Message -
From:
Valeriy
Molyakov
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:02
PM
Subject: Help:What type of a
configuration Tomcat is more preferable to industrial use
Whether there is some more advantage except stability ?
For example :
Speed
of service
Service of a lot of the clients
Security
What sense of use of the
www-server(Apache), if I use only JSP and Servlets ?
I don't understand
!
- Original Message -
From:
D.Lion
To:
1/ Apache is
faster better when serving static content such as
images
2/ You get
more error handling ability with apache (ie, when tomcat goes down for releases,
etc, Apache gets a 500 error and can display a polite notice rather than nasty
error pages)
3/ You get
all the other stuff
As I understand it, Apache does not have the ability to serve up JSP pages alone. It
requires
Tomcat for that. Tomcat has the ability to do both. However, should there be a
fairly heavy load
on a Tomcat server, Apache will be able to relieve some of that load by serving up the
static
pages,
I understand !
But , if a graphics files and the static pages are contained in structure of
the web application ? In this case the static context serve Tomcat or Apache
?
- Original Message -
From: "Ren West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:39
-Original Message-
From: Valeriy Molyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 22 februari 2001 15:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help:What type of a configuration Tomcat is more
preferable
to industrial use
I understand !
But , if a graphics files and the static
