RE: HttpSession Replication in Tomcat Cluster not working with EJ B's!

2004-04-05 Thread Suraj Prabhu
Filip, You were right. It's works with the handle. Thanx for all the co-operation. cheers Suraj -Original Message- From: Filip Hanik (lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:51 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: HttpSession Replication in Tomcat Cluster not

RE: HttpSession Replication in Tomcat Cluster not working with EJ B's!

2004-03-26 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
I think you need to store the EJBHandle, not the actual bean that you are referencing. is that what you are doing? Filip -Original Message- From: Suraj Prabhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: HttpSession Replication in

RE: HttpSession Replication in Tomcat Cluster not working with EJ B's!

2004-03-24 Thread Suraj Prabhu
Andy, I agree with your point about a SFSB being an extension of a client. But then, if I store the 'state' alone in the httpsession and update the state by using a new SFSB everytime, the whole concept of SFSB's are lost. I would rather use a stateless session bean and use httpsession for

RE: HttpSession Replication in Tomcat Cluster not working with EJ B's!

2004-03-22 Thread Bodycombe, Andrew
Think of a stateful session bean as an extension of the client. By storing the remote reference inside your session, you are attempting to persist your Client extension across 2 different clients (2 different tomcat instances). I don't think this is a sensible idea, and I'm not sure it's even