RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Joshua Sunil Kumar
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:37 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Joshua, Here are the extracts from my conf files. I am running Apache 2.0.43 with mod_jk and Tomcat 4.1.18 also, so please

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Joshua Sunil Kumar
Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Joshua, Here are the extracts from my conf files. I am running Apache 2.0.43 with mod_jk and Tomcat 4.1.18 also, so please check carefully that you have similar. workers.properties: worker.list

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Roberts, Eric
2003 10:45 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Hi I tried correcting the typo but it does not work .Infact the load balancing itself doesn't work if I change it to jvmRoute. BR Joshua -Original Me

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Joshua Sunil Kumar
ectory BR Joshua -Original Message- From: Roberts, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Filip's memory is correct. In server.xml yo

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Roberts, Eric
using jk or jk2? Eric -Original Message- From: Joshua Sunil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 March 2003 10:14 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Hi I check out in the server.xml there is no

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Joshua Sunil Kumar
ginal Message- From: Roberts, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. Filip's memory is correct. In server.xml you need an entry on the engi

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-10 Thread Roberts, Eric
Filip's memory is correct. In server.xml you need an entry on the engine element: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 March 2003 07:36 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector. BlankI remember there be

RE: Problem with sticky session in Tomcat4.1.18 and Apache 2.0.43 using mod_JK Connector.

2003-03-09 Thread Filip Hanik
BlankI remember there being a property called jvmRoute in the server.xml file that would allow the Apache workers to make sure you got the right Tomcat server upon the next request. otherwise, you can just cluster enable your system, and it should work for you. http://www.filip.net/tomcat-clusteri