no, I'm not returning anything from the servlet.
It's not returning anything! You must return after using sendRedirect,
otherwise your servlet will continue running. That's probably the problem,
as it redirects you to another page, but continues it's execution. Try
returning.
Carlos Pereira
Howdy,
It is either so glaringly obvious that no one deems an answer
worthwhile
(RTFM), or so really really difficult, and no one knows how do this.
Surely
not. Either way I need to know.
Don't forget two more options: people don't care to read your message at
all, or they read it and don't
and let us know if it worked.
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Pereira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:09 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RTFM
no, I'm not returning anything from the servlet.
It's not returning anything! You must
That should've been RTFP. P=Post
Doesn't that just require a hyperlink? If you wanted to from your web page
to google, you'd just have a hyperlink that goes http://www.google.com/;
Unless you mean something different, that question begs the question:
Have you used a web browser before? ;-)
Have you tried using JavaScript. The window.location =
http://localhost:8080/app2 may work.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RTFM
Hi,
Now I have your attention,
Hi,
Yes, I have tried all manner of things - client and server. The problem is that
while the desired destination URL is oresent in the address bar, the session remains
from the original. Hence a mutation with various error messages of the first can be
seen.
G.
Have you tried using
Have you tried clearing the session before redirecting?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/14/04 03:41PM
Hi,
Yes, I have tried all manner of things - client and server. The
problem is that while the desired destination URL is oresent in the
address bar, the session remains from the original. Hence a
yes:
request.getSession().invalidate();
String page = /app2/index.jsp?userid=aname
response.sendRedirect(page);
//RequestDispatcher rd = request.getRequestDispatcher(page);
//rd.forward(request, response);
using the RequestDispatcher gets the same results.
G.
Keshav Sarin [EMAIL
I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RTFM
Hi,
Now I have your attention, will
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email.
George Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I generally don't think it is required to
resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email.
George Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original
interest and to work to prioritize
your request for help.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email
request for help.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't
: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like
, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of
bodyof the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message
List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of
bodyof the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel
, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents
of
bodyof the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our
List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of
bodyof the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RTFM
in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body
of the email.
George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it
is required to resort to things like this to
get our attention.
-Original Message-
From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL
Paul Brinkley wrote:
The solution that causes the least amount of distress to all
parties (that I can think of) is to teach netiquette to Internet
newcomers in some hard-to-avoid location.
[...]
Unfortunately, this is a culture change, and hence it will take
a while, possibly as much as a
At 05:59 PM 2/13/2003 -0800, Jeff Wishnie wrote:
Although I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment--do your homework
before asking for help--lets not forget that given the
disorganized state of most opensource documentation, being pointed to the
proper docs helps a lot.
Specifically, when
RTFM - Read The Friendly Manual!
-gnana
Sachin Phatak wrote:
RTFM - I've seen this abbr. in use.
What does it stand for?
Sachin
PS.
I can see a few sniggering faces but how's a guy to know if he doen't ask?
It's a crude term used by computer nerds in frustration meaning Read the
fucking manual.
Usually means that you have asked a question that is covered in the basic
tutorials, or which is clearly documented somewhere or has already been
covered in previous discussions.
-Original Message-
Read The F'ing Manual
Roger
Please read the fine Jargon File, at http://www.tf.hut.fi/cgi-bin/jargon .
-- Bill K.
-Original Message-
From: Sachin Phatak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
26 matches
Mail list logo
