Re: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Woodchuck
hihi all, does Tomcat 5.5.x handle this instance pooling transparently for objects implementing STM? do i need to configure Tomcat to turn on this feature? tia, woodchuck --- Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your statement is completely wrong, STM is fully supported in Tomcat > 5.

Re: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Anto Paul
On 6/8/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your best bet for understanding multithreading issues is to get a good > understanding of the JVM. > Can you recommend one ? -- rgds Anto Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA

Re: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Dakota Jack
ROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:15 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues > > > From: Michael Pasko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Servlet Concurrency Issues > > > > I started allowing other users on it, I stumbled o

Re: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
On 6/8/05, Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your statement is completely wrong, STM is fully supported in Tomcat > > 5.5, with instance pooling for good performance. > > Sorry, Remy - I should have checked rather than relying on memor

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Your statement is completely wrong, STM is fully supported in Tomcat > 5.5, with instance pooling for good performance. Sorry, Remy - I should have checked rather than relying on memory. - Peter -

Re: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
On 6/8/05, Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that SingleThreadModel isn't supported in more recent versions of > Tomcat. This may or may not worry you depending on whether you want to > move to a more recent version :-). I've posted already about that: if you don't know about somet

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: Michael Pasko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To mimic the desired behavior I've fixed > the problem by adding this (implements SingleThreadModel)... > > public class ServletName implements SingleThreadModel Note that SingleThreadModel isn't supported in more recent versions of Tomcat. This

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 June 2005 13:33 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues Thanks Chuck, that was exactly the problem. I was under the very poor assumption that a new thread and newly instantiated servlet object was created every time a reques

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-08 Thread Michael Pasko
les R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:15 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues > From: Michael Pasko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Servlet Concurrency Issues > > I started allowing other users on it, I stumbled on some problems.

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-07 Thread George Sexton
You're probably using instance properties on the servlet object. George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -Original Message- > From: Michael Pasko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:09 PM > To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apac

RE: Servlet Concurrency Issues

2005-06-07 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Michael Pasko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Servlet Concurrency Issues > > I started allowing other users on it, I stumbled on some problems. > Basically what happens, when user A submits the form, and then 2 > seconds later user B submits the same form. User A stops getting > r