Re: USE TOMCAT INSTEAD OF IIS

2001-10-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 20 Oct 2001, Peter Mutsaers wrote: > > Mangi> rather use a word processor. If we push the tomcat engine > Mangi> towards being a fully featured webserver isn't it > Mangi> eventually going to bloat? Won't the task we asked it to do > Mangi> (handle servlet/jsp requests) wind

Re: USE TOMCAT INSTEAD OF IIS

2001-10-20 Thread Peter Mutsaers
>> "Mangi" == Mangi, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mangi> Like any well planned out software project the ideal Mangi> solution is derived >> from the requirements. There are very few broad statements such as "Maybe Mangi> for large volume servers, but for smaller servers (<10

RE: USE TOMCAT INSTEAD OF IIS

2001-10-18 Thread Mangi, Rick
the task we asked it to do (handle servlet/jsp requests) wind up suffering? Anyway, that's just my opinion. Rick -Original Message- From: Peter Mutsaers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: USE TOMCAT INSTEAD OF IIS

Re: USE TOMCAT INSTEAD OF IIS

2001-10-18 Thread Peter Mutsaers
>> "Rui" == Rui Miguel Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rui> No. Rui> Use apache web server instead of iis or tomcat webserver. Rui> Even the configuration is MUCH MUCH easier (and safer even in Rui> default config). Maybe for large volume servers, but for smaller servers (<1