Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread rsequeira
Tomcat Users List omcast.net> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: 03/02/2004 10:42 AM Subje

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
Kennan, I can agree partially to yours. But if you see him, he doesn't know about the impact of JVM and tuning parameters, as he mentioned in his email. Do you expect him to take a lead in fixing that? I have seen the projects losing its focus by the nature of peoples deviating to get their intere

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Kannan Sundararajan
Yes, But that doesn't mean that we can put and point on developers for any problem. -Original Message- From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat No that's not

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
Stephen, In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying up, they're definately screwing up. Whoa there pardner: I am not going to deliberately cripple a production box. The problem has been demonstated

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
TECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 4:31 PM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat > > Sysadmins are sysadmins AND developers are developers. No one > cannot cross the borderline or even compare. >

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Stephen Carville
On Monday March 01 2004 06:42 pm, Christopher Schultz wrote: > >> Tried that. Capped it at 35 and the webserver stopped servicing any > >> DB request as soon as the pool reached 35. This is why I believe the > >> pool management is faulty and/or something is hogging all the > >> connections. > >

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Kannan Sundararajan
velopers and him. If he is very keen, why not one of the developers responding his thread and get the issues fixed for the project. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:49 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts w

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
Antonio, In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying up, they're definately screwing up. It is. But developers may reply: "You are using less connections than those specified in (the contract) / (t

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Antonio Fiol Bonnín
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet Specification. I'm just curious: is this actually a violation of the servlet spec? The API seems to indicate that you can put anything in the session that you wan

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
Kannan, Being yourself as SYSADMIN for UNIX and Network, it would be nice that developers or professional should take a lead into get into this problem. Easy for you to say. Let's face it: these guys have a connection leak. Plain and simple. Your devs need to find their leak. It is demonstrable.

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
Antonio, And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for established login sessions. Customer don't like that. That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet Specification. I'm just curious

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Kannan Sundararajan
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:18 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer: "According to the document that the link below refers to, a single instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs,

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Mike Curwen
hould know better! > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:18 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat > > > Here is some more information on the problem. From a develo

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-03-01 Thread Stephen Carville
Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer: "According to the document that the link below refers to, a single instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs, where each JVM represents a virtual host. The following link clearly states this virtual host concept as it applies to Tom

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-02-29 Thread Antonio Fiol Bonnín
Stephen Carville wrote: Restarting tomcat clers this up. That's good! :) And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for established login sessions. Customer don't like that. That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in sessions are

RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-02-29 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
Your developers may be right in the end but with wrong arguments. With virtual hosting or several webapps you have just one jvm. But each webapp has it's own classloader. If the pool is loaded by the wepapp classloader you will have one instance of the pool for each webapp. > -Original Mes

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-02-29 Thread Stephen Carville
On Sunday February 29 2004 11:58 am, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Stephen, > > > I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections > > to an oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of > > open connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the o

Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat

2004-02-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
Stephen, I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections to an oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of open connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle server to use all of its swap. That's not good :( Restarting tomcat c