Hi Zsolt,
I personally find it best to read the response on top and to be
able to afterwards read the full request if necessary. So I
don't need to search it between the hundreds of messages that
come during a day. As bandwiths doesn't matter today, the
increased size shouldn't be a problem.
Yeah, I see top posts as personal preference too, and often not something configurable
in your reader. And, as long as you are careful in how you word your reply, the
message may end up more readable than an inline-response. (Though there are definite
times for both).
The others are
Personally, I have privately e-mailed someone on this list who is notorious
for putting a small note at the bottom of an excessively long message
thread, but so far to no avail. I may just add a filter to my mail client
to discard his messages, since I'm running out of interest in scrolling
them.
Zsolt Antal wrote:
Hi,
Is the following normal, accepted or simply `we must live with it'?
- html post
This is debatable. There is no fixed standard on what a HTML message is. A
HTML document embedded into the body of the real message as a MIME chunk is so
far the closest description I've
.
--
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 5:17 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Weird messages
Zsolt Antal wrote:
Hi,
Is the following normal, accepted or simply `we must live with it'?
- html post
This is debatable
I think that HTML mails are a bad habbit. (But I think
they are not allowed in this list anyway, AFAIK HTML mails
are blocked by the list server, at least there was some
discussion to do this several month ago, and I haven't
recognized a HTML mail in this listz since then)
I accept reply below,
