-
From: Michael Coughlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Why JBoss (and Tomcat)?
Thanks again for the reply, Tim. As you can tell, I am a
little confused
although it's becoming somewhat more clear.
J2EE
Thanks for the great reply.
You are mixing several different things:
I agree. Sorry to be so thick, everyone. I hope I am not too far off topic
with this conversation thread, but I simply don't understand how JBoss
differs from the J2EE SDK.
- J2EE is a spec that consists of several
Michael Coughlan wrote:
I agree. Sorry to be so thick, everyone. I hope I am not too far off topic
with this conversation thread, but I simply don't understand how JBoss
differs from the J2EE SDK.
There is a specification for J2EE, and then Sun makes an
implementation of that specification,
-
From: Michael Coughlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why JBoss (and Tomcat)?
So, why heck would I want it if I have the J2EE SDK and other fun Sun
dowloads? Doesn't Sun offer *thee original* implementation
(J2EE SDK the is not intended as a tool for production)
Thanks for the post. Can you please clarify?
Are you saying that the J2EE SDK is not production quality while JBoss is?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Perhaps this will help you decide which application server to use.
http://www.theserverside.com/reviews/matrix.jsp
This Matrix is excellent. Thanks, James.
I noticed that J2EE x Tomcat was not checked off?
For my project, I will need servlets with J2EE, JMS etc.
Why can't I simply use
Michael Coughlan wrote:
It seems to me that I might want to blow away my Tomcat install and unpack
JBoss (with Tomcat).
You should look at what you will need, in terms of features, and what
you can spend, and then decide. Sun's implementation also uses Tomcat
as do at least some of the other
Michael Coughlan wrote:
Thanks for the post. Can you please clarify?
Are you saying that the J2EE SDK is not production quality while JBoss is?
I believe the reference implementation is not meant for production,
from Sun, but for $2k or $10k/cpu you can buy one that is.
Tomcat is a servlet (and jsp) container. Thats it, nothing else. Zippo.
JBoss is a full J2EE server which offers all the J2EE services (and one of
those things being tomcat)
-Tim
Michael Coughlan wrote:
This might seem like an embarrassing question (or a poor post for the
Tomcat-user list),
Thanks for the reply.
Tomcat is a servlet (and jsp) container. Thats it, nothing else. Zippo.
Understood. Although Tomcat seems to be more robust than Apache in tracking
sessions and saving state, which is what App Servers did in the past.
JBoss is a full J2EE server which offers all the
Two words man: full J2EE ;-)
Dnia 12/21/2003 09:32 PM, Uz.ytkownik Michael Coughlan napisa?:
This might seem like an embarrassing question (or a poor post for the
Tomcat-user list), but why would a developer want to download JBoss with
Tomcat bundled instead of Tomcat alone?
Does the Jakarta
J2EE includes JMS, EJB, and a bunch of other acronyms. java.sun.com should
have a whitepaper about j2ee and everything it can do. Most of the acronyms
are enablers to solve some business problem. (Other acronyms sometime feel
like they just allow consultants to make a lot of money ;) )
There
Thanks again for the reply, Tim. As you can tell, I am a little confused
although it's becoming somewhat more clear.
J2EE includes JMS, EJB, and a bunch of other acronyms.
java.sun.com should
have a whitepaper about j2ee and everything it can do.
I think I can imagine that whitepaper. This
13 matches
Mail list logo
