Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Lin wrote: today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes, it continue to

RE: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi Peter, Just wanted to say thank you for running these benchmarks. They're useful and insightful. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Peter Lin
I've done a fair amount of jsp and servlet development since 99 when JSP .9 spec wasn't implemented in most servlet containers. I doubt I can provide insight into improving reliability that tomcat developers haven't already thought of. Most of the projects I've worked on the last three

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Lin wrote: I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used. All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture of my desktop. Thanks for the small benchmark. It is a bit odd

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Lin
today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes, it continue to accept requests.

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-04 Thread Peter Lin
I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used. All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture of my desktop. peter Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm posting some

RE: benchmark

2002-01-21 Thread Emerson
what you mean by : cranked up the min and max processors to 2-3x the defaults ?? how you do that?? the tomcat was working with apache thanks for sharing your info! B -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: benchmark

2002-01-18 Thread Brian Adams
thanks for sharing your info! B -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: benchmark Greetings everyone, a quick thanks to the tomcat developers for their hardwork. I just spent two week

Re: Benchmark

2001-11-15 Thread David Cassidy
Try http://webperformanceinc.com We've used it here and its really rather good. You 'train' it by setting your browser to use it as a proxy and then go through the bits of the site you want to test. You login and it records the data you sent Then you can get it to give your site alot of pain.