RE: connectionTimeout

2004-01-23 Thread Krause Karin
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2004 09:19 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: connectionTimeout I agree with you that closing the socket on each request isn't a good idea. But I have the feeling that only if the socket is closed the thread is freed and Tomcat can accept new input

RE: connectionTimeout

2004-01-22 Thread Krause Karin
ead number of three, I did only sequential requests). So what do you think? Cheers Karin -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2004 04:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: connectionTimeout connectionTimeout="-1" (or c

Re: connectionTimeout

2004-01-21 Thread Bill Barker
ker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 10:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: connectionTimeout > > > > "Krause Karin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi everybody, > > > I ha

RE: connectionTimeout

2004-01-21 Thread Krause Karin
back to the client. Tomcat can only accept new requests if the socket is removed (and it is removed when the connectionTimeout is reached). Cheers Karin -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 10:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: connectionTimeout

2004-01-21 Thread Bill Barker
"Krause Karin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi everybody, > > I have a question regarding the configuration/behaviour of the org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector (Tomcat 4.1.27). > I use Tomcat together with Apache (over mod_jk). > When I set the connectionT

Re: connectionTimeout

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Barker
It depends on which you are using. The value of "0" is simply that both the Http-Coyote and the Jk-Coyote would both behave as the docs describe for "-1". For the Jk-Coyote Connector, you usually want the connectionTimeout disabled, or at least set to a large value (e.g. 5min). The mod_jk modul

Re: connectionTimeout

2003-08-14 Thread Geralyn M Hollerman
Bill Barker wrote: > It depends on which you are using. The value of "0" is > simply > that both the Http-Coyote and the Jk-Coyote would both behave as the > docs > describe for "-1". Yes, Coyote was what I was thinking of. > For the Jk-Coyote Connector, you usually want the connectionTimeout

Re: connectionTimeout

2003-08-07 Thread Bill Barker
"Geralyn M Hollerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bill Barker wrote: > > > It depends on which you are using. The value of "0" is > > simply > > that both the Http-Coyote and the Jk-Coyote would both behave as the > > docs > > describe for "-1". > > Yes, Coyote