Re: idle connections

2005-02-03 Thread Paul
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: Re: idle connections > I think I get your meaning. Basically its ok/good to have 50 > connections idle connections laying around becaus

Re: idle connections

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Winterer
Hi! the parameter "maxIdle" is the maximum number of idle connections that can retain in the pool. That means it is ok for the pool to have 50 connections waiting for usage - you told him to do so! So what different behaviour did you expect? Best regards, Tex Hey, wondering if someone could he

Re: idle connections

2005-02-02 Thread Parsons Technical Services
EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: Re: idle connections I think I get your meaning. Basically its ok/good to have 50 connections idle connections laying around because those will get used for future queries. This whole prob

Re: idle connections

2005-02-02 Thread Bobby Tahir
eturn the connection to > the pool ready for use by another pool user. > > -Original Message- > From: Bobby Tahir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 February 2005 22:13 > To: Al Sutton > Subject: Re: idle connections > > I supposed I should have said "how

RE: idle connections

2005-02-02 Thread Al Sutton
Doesn't setting maxIdle to 50 mean that you've confiured it to have 50 connections idle and not do anything about them? Try lowering this number if you want less connections left open. -Original Message- From: Bobby Tahir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 February 2005 22:05 To: Tomcat U