Thanks for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ruthenbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 6, 2004 5:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: invoker servlet, tomcat 4.1.29, apache 2.0.48 and connector
jk2
Hmm -- everything looks correct (though I don't use the invoker
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/misc.html#invoker
-Tim
Maxime Pelletier wrote:
Hi,
We upgraded our tomcat to 4.1.29 and apache to 2.0.48 recently and we have
lost access to all servlet invoked in the following form
http://address/servlet/MyServlet
the apache does no longer pass the
Since you're able to hit your servlets through the invoker when pointing
to Tomcat directly, this sounds like a connector problem. Check your
workers[2].properties to make sure you're passing requests for /servlet
through to Apache.
justin
At 11:47 AM 1/6/2004, you wrote:
=org.apache.naming.resources.FileDirContext
allowLinking=true/
/Context
Any idea ?
Thanks
Max
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ruthenbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 6, 2004 3:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: invoker servlet, tomcat 4.1.29, apache 2.0.48 and connector
jk2
Since you're able
=org.apache.naming.resources.FileDirContext
allowLinking=true/
/Context
Any idea ?
Thanks
Max
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ruthenbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 6, 2004 3:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: invoker servlet, tomcat 4.1.29, apache 2.0.48 and connector
/servlet-name
url-pattern/servlet/CPE_TextEditServlet/url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
Thanks again,
Max
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ruthenbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 6, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: invoker servlet, tomcat 4.1.29, apache 2.0.48
Subject: Re: invoker servlet, tomcat 4.1.29, apache 2.0.48 and connector
jk2
Since you're able to hit your servlets through the invoker when pointing
to Tomcat directly, this sounds like a connector problem. Check your
workers[2].properties to make sure you're passing requests for
/servlet
through
