From: Nikola Milutinovic
Sent: 9. sijeanj 2004 7:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 8. sijeanj 2004 16:34
Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker and then
isolate
Mladen Turk wrote:
That was the thing that I considered, but again if you have
multiple
workers, what would be the benefit of having that much Tomcat
instances running.
What is the real benefit of running TC from within Apache via JNI?
It should be a faster, cause there is no socket channel
From: Nikola Milutinovic
Sent: 9. sijeanj 2004 10:18
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
What is the real benefit of running TC from within Apache via JNI?
It should be a faster, cause there is no socket channel
involved, and
all
.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 17:54
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
I thought I had a rough understanding but it turns out that I
dont %-) Do you mean that JNI
Mladen Turk wrote:
Look at the thread.
Unfortunately the JNI isn't of much use on Linux, or to be more specific, on
any multi child mpm.
If you manage to maintain the single worker process (like winnt-mpm does),
then you can use the JNI.
The reason for that is quite simple; You cannot have two
-Original Message-
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Yep I see what you mean know (fog of stupidity lifts).
Ok so to iterate, the problem is that since linux has
multiple workers, these workers will want to attach
themselves to their own tomcat instance.
How about this then..instead
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Yep I see what you mean know (fog of stupidity lifts).
Ok so to iterate, the problem is that since linux
has multiple workers, these workers will want to attach
themselves to their own tomcat instance.
How about this then..instead of launching
several tomcat instances
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Subject: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
Hi everyone,
Bringing the woes of jk2+JNI again here with the dreaded
Can't find child xx in scoreboard, since I haven't found a
satisfactory answer by anyone.
Using TC5 with Apache 2.0.x under Linux, I can
to who can access them)?
I'll be more than happy to volunteer for the documentation, just point at
the right direction :)
Thank you,
Yiannis
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 14:48
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 JNI
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 8. sijeanj 2004 16:34
Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker
and then isolate that worker from the rest of the pool
(possibly provide the ability for workers to carry some sort
of identification bit with regards to who can access
I've tried compiling the jk2 code in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors from CVS and get the
following error for this file:
common/jk_channel_socket.c
common/jk_channel_socket.c:74:2: #error
jk_channel_socket is deprecated
Any thoughts?
I've gotten both IP and UNIX sockets to work on Fedora
Core 1
From: Mark Eggers
Sent: 8. sijeanj 2004 18:09
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
I've tried compiling the jk2 code in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors from CVS and get the following
error for this file:
common/jk_channel_socket.c
OK . . . when I take a break from job searching I'll
look at that and the missing -laprutil-0 in
server/apache2/Makefile
It's probably missing in the appropriate mod_jk
Makefile as well.
/mde/
just my two cents . . . .
Yes.
Few months ago we decided to use the APR as
mandatory for JK2.
As
That was the thing that I considered, but again if you have multiple
workers, what would be the benefit of having that much Tomcat instances
running.
So either you have a single worker with the single TC instance launched or
none.
Having single worker running TC, keeping the rest 30 without
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
I thought I had a rough understanding but it turns out that I
dont %-) Do you mean that JNI will work only under one worker
containing a single child process?
Are you using the Tomcat as in or out of the process?
In process tomcat (invoked from webserver) can
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 8. sijeanj 2004 16:34
Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker
and then isolate that worker from the rest of the pool
(possibly provide the ability for workers to carry some sort
of identification bit with regards to who can
16 matches
Mail list logo
